On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:46:43PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hey Thierry,
>
> On 29-09-15 09:45, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 09:19:27AM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> >>Hey Thierry, list
> >>
> >>I'm going over the pwm core and notice that in the pwm header, duty_ns a
Hey Thierry,
On 29-09-15 09:45, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 09:19:27AM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hey Thierry, list
I'm going over the pwm core and notice that in the pwm header, duty_ns and
period_ns is internally stored as an unsigned int.
struct pwm_device {
cons
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 09:19:27AM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hey Thierry, list
>
> I'm going over the pwm core and notice that in the pwm header, duty_ns and
> period_ns is internally stored as an unsigned int.
>
> struct pwm_device {
> const char *label;
> unsigned long flags;
>
Hey Thierry, list
I'm going over the pwm core and notice that in the pwm header, duty_ns
and period_ns is internally stored as an unsigned int.
struct pwm_device {
const char *label;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int hwpwm;
unsigned int pwm;
struct pwm_chip *chip;
void
4 matches
Mail list logo