On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >
> > > I've now been running kernels (both PREEMPT, SMP, both and without both)
> > > with the patch below applied for a few days and I see no ill effects. I'm
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
I've now been running kernels (both PREEMPT, SMP, both and without both)
with the patch below applied for a few days and I see no ill effects. I'm
still
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > I've now been running kernels (both PREEMPT, SMP, both and without both)
> > with the patch below applied for a few days and I see no ill effects. I'm
> > still interrested in comments about wether or
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> I've now been running kernels (both PREEMPT, SMP, both and without both)
> with the patch below applied for a few days and I see no ill effects. I'm
> still interrested in comments about wether or not something like this
> makes sense and is acceptable
I've now been running kernels (both PREEMPT, SMP, both and without both)
with the patch below applied for a few days and I see no ill effects. I'm
still interrested in comments about wether or not something like this
makes sense and is acceptable ?
--
Jesper Juhl
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005,
I've now been running kernels (both PREEMPT, SMP, both and without both)
with the patch below applied for a few days and I see no ill effects. I'm
still interrested in comments about wether or not something like this
makes sense and is acceptable ?
--
Jesper Juhl
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005,
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
I've now been running kernels (both PREEMPT, SMP, both and without both)
with the patch below applied for a few days and I see no ill effects. I'm
still interrested in comments about wether or not something like this
makes sense and is acceptable ?
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
I've now been running kernels (both PREEMPT, SMP, both and without both)
with the patch below applied for a few days and I see no ill effects. I'm
still interrested in comments about wether or not
I'm often building the tree with gcc -W to look for potential trouble
spots, and of course I see a lot of warning messages. I'm well aware that
most of these don't indicate actual problems and should just be ignored,
but the less warnings there are the easier it is to zoom in on the ones
that
I'm often building the tree with gcc -W to look for potential trouble
spots, and of course I see a lot of warning messages. I'm well aware that
most of these don't indicate actual problems and should just be ignored,
but the less warnings there are the easier it is to zoom in on the ones
that
10 matches
Mail list logo
