On Sunday 23 September 2012 06:16 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:16:11PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
>>
>> I was going to push it through the m68knommu gi
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:16:11PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
>
> I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
> if you would rather take it wit
On 09/22/2012 04:39 AM, Al Viro wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread
branch.
Mark Salter (3):
c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread()
c6x: switch to generic kernel
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread
> branch.
>
> Mark Salter (3):
> c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread()
> c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve
> c6x: switch to gener
Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread
branch.
Mark Salter (3):
c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread()
c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve
c6x: switch to generic sys_execve
arch/c6x/include/asm/syscalls.h |5 ---
arch/c6x/includ
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 05:50:34PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> It must be noted that despite having seemingly independent
> __ARCH_WANT_(KERNEL|SYS)_EXECVE, arches which have a kernel syscall trap
> based kernel_execve(), e.g. MIPS, can't implement __ARCH_WANT_SYS_EXECVE
> alone - the
On Friday 07 September 2012 11:50 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
> situation in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal #execve2
> and consider sending the corresponding patches for missing architectures.
>
> What's getting done
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:29:10AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On 09/07/2012 08:20 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
> >situation in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal #execve2
> >and consider sending the corresponding p
Hi Al,
On 09/07/2012 08:20 PM, Al Viro wrote:
To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
situation in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal #execve2
and consider sending the corresponding patches for missing architectures.
I have sent two patches. Please appl
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:20:01PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> C6X works fine with these patches to switch over to generic code.
>
>
> Mark Salter (2):
> c6x: implement ret_from_kernel_execve() and switch to generic
> kernel_execve()
> c6x: switch to generic sys_execve()
>
> arch/c6x/in
On 09/11/2012 02:49 AM, Al Viro wrote:
BTW, the same question goes for many other embedded targets - I'm using
qemu for arm and mips and hercules for s390; alpha, parisc, ppc32 and sparc64 -
on actual hardware, amd64 and i386 - on kvm guests (all with debian userland);
ia64 kinda-sorta works with
On 09/11/2012 02:49 AM, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:40:11PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
Hi Al,
On 09/08/2012 04:20 AM, Al Viro wrote:
To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
situation in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal #execve2
and consi
C6X works fine with these patches to switch over to generic code.
Mark Salter (2):
c6x: implement ret_from_kernel_execve() and switch to generic
kernel_execve()
c6x: switch to generic sys_execve()
arch/c6x/include/asm/syscalls.h |5 ---
arch/c6x/include/asm/unistd.h |3 ++
arc
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:40:11PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On 09/08/2012 04:20 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> > To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
> >situation in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal #execve2
> >and consider sending the corresponding p
Hi Al,
On 09/08/2012 04:20 AM, Al Viro wrote:
To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
situation in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal #execve2
and consider sending the corresponding patches for missing architectures.
I can see you have some m68k patches
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:20:04PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
> situation in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal #execve2
It should be commit 50343ee2889f5a8cff1aa30110f07b0e01563500 right now.
--
To unsubscribe from this l
To architecture maintainers: please, review the current
situation in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal #execve2
and consider sending the corresponding patches for missing architectures.
What's getting done is unification of sys_execve()/kernel_execve()
into arch-i
17 matches
Mail list logo
