On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:46:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > > Instead, I'd rather issue a warning that the swsusp header mismatches,
> > > > say
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> ...
>
> > > Instead, I'd rather issue a warning that the swsusp header mismatches,
> > > say with
> > > which kernel the machine got suspended with and then start the
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
> > Instead, I'd rather issue a warning that the swsusp header mismatches, say
> > with
> > which kernel the machine got suspended with and then start the countdown
> > for reboot.
>
> What exactly would that change? You
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:50:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100,
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:50:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > > > Well,
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:50:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
Well, there's a patchset in
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:50:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J.
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
Instead, I'd rather issue a warning that the swsusp header mismatches, say
with
which kernel the machine got suspended with and then start the countdown
for reboot.
What exactly would that change? You need to
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
Instead, I'd rather issue a warning that the swsusp header mismatches,
say with
which kernel the machine got suspended with and then start the countdown
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:46:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
Instead, I'd rather issue a warning that the swsusp header mismatches,
say with
which
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:50:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > Well, there's a patchset in the current mainline that allows you to
> > >
On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > Well, there's a patchset in the current mainline that allows you to use
> > > > arbitrary (sufficiently new) kernel to load the image and then restore
>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
> > > Well, there's a patchset in the current mainline that allows you to use
> > > arbitrary (sufficiently new) kernel to load the image and then restore the
> > > image kernel. So, you can hibernate 2.6.24-rc3 and use
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
Well, there's a patchset in the current mainline that allows you to use
arbitrary (sufficiently new) kernel to load the image and then restore the
image kernel. So, you can hibernate 2.6.24-rc3 and use 2.6.24-rc2 to
On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
Well, there's a patchset in the current mainline that allows you to use
arbitrary (sufficiently new) kernel to load the image and then restore
the
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:50:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:19:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
Well, there's a patchset in the current mainline that allows you to
use
On Friday, 7 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:46:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 6 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > Hi Pavel,
> > > hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > after a quick search i couldn't find anything dealing with the topic
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:46:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> > hi Rafael,
> >
> > after a quick search i couldn't find anything dealing with the topic in the
> > subject line so here we go:
> >
> > One sometimes can
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:46:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 6 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Pavel,
hi Rafael,
after a quick search i couldn't find anything dealing with the topic in the
subject line so here we go:
One sometimes can mix up (and by
On Friday, 7 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:46:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 6 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Pavel,
hi Rafael,
after a quick search i couldn't find anything dealing with the topic in
the
On Thursday, 6 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> hi Rafael,
>
> after a quick search i couldn't find anything dealing with the topic in the
> subject line so here we go:
>
> One sometimes can mix up (and by one i mean me) the
> kernel images one boots after having suspended
Hi Pavel,
hi Rafael,
after a quick search i couldn't find anything dealing with the topic in the
subject line so here we go:
One sometimes can mix up (and by one i mean me) the
kernel images one boots after having suspended the machine previously. There can
be at least two reasons for that:
1.
Hi Pavel,
hi Rafael,
after a quick search i couldn't find anything dealing with the topic in the
subject line so here we go:
One sometimes can mix up (and by one i mean me) the
kernel images one boots after having suspended the machine previously. There can
be at least two reasons for that:
1.
On Thursday, 6 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Pavel,
hi Rafael,
after a quick search i couldn't find anything dealing with the topic in the
subject line so here we go:
One sometimes can mix up (and by one i mean me) the
kernel images one boots after having suspended the
24 matches
Mail list logo