On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:05:51PM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:48:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:46:39PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > Since we cannot set these attributes we should special-case the
> > > immutable/append on d
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:48:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:46:39PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > Since we cannot set these attributes we should special-case the
> > immutable/append on delete for symlinks, this would be consistent with
> > what we *do* allow on L
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:46:39PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Since we cannot set these attributes we should special-case the
> immutable/append on delete for symlinks, this would be consistent with
> what we *do* allow on Linux for all filesystems.
Er... So why not simply sanity-check it
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:38:55AM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:17:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:03:28AM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Groovy, thanks, let's not forget the xfs_repair respective fix :) let me
> > > know
> >
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:17:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:03:28AM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Groovy, thanks, let's not forget the xfs_repair respective fix :) let me
> > know
> > if you have any feedback on that.
>
> TBH I've lost any proposed xfs_repa
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:03:28AM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:30:55PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 05:45:12PM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:23:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 26,
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:30:55PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 05:45:12PM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:23:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:46:39PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > Linux filesyste
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 05:45:12PM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:23:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:46:39PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Linux filesystems cannot set extra file attributes (stx_attributes as per
> > > statx(2)
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:23:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:46:39PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Linux filesystems cannot set extra file attributes (stx_attributes as per
> > statx(2)) on a symbolic link. To set extra file attributes you issue
> > ioctl(2) w
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:46:39PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Linux filesystems cannot set extra file attributes (stx_attributes as per
> statx(2)) on a symbolic link. To set extra file attributes you issue
> ioctl(2) with FS_IOC_SETFLAGS, *all* ioctl(2) calls on a symbolic link
> yield EBAD
Linux filesystems cannot set extra file attributes (stx_attributes as per
statx(2)) on a symbolic link. To set extra file attributes you issue
ioctl(2) with FS_IOC_SETFLAGS, *all* ioctl(2) calls on a symbolic link
yield EBADF.
This is because ioctl(2) tries to obtain struct fd from the symbolic li
11 matches
Mail list logo