Hi all,
I’ve just put up a blog-entry explaining the rationale behind yaml and device
tree.
https://www.konsulko.com/yaml-and-device-tree/
Please give it a quick glance and give feedback if you can.
Regards
— Pantelis
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
>> On Oct 22, 2017, at 19:54 , Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Grant,
>>>
On Oct 20, 2017, at 20:46 , Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at
Hi Grant,
> On Oct 22, 2017, at 19:54 , Grant Likely wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 20:46 , Grant Likely wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> wrote:
Hello again,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 20:46 , Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>> Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of
>>> not only g
Hi Grant,
> On Oct 20, 2017, at 20:46 , Grant Likely wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hello again,
>>
>> Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of
>> not only generating yaml from DTS source but also compiling DTS sources
>> and
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of
> not only generating yaml from DTS source but also compiling DTS sources
> and being almost fully compatible with DTC.
>
> Compiling the kernel's DTBs us
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 06:19:03PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > On Oct 10, 2017, at 04:50 , David Gibson
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 06:07:28PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >>> On Oct 9, 2017, at 03:00 , David Gibson
> >>> wrote:
>
Hi David,
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 04:50 , David Gibson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 06:07:28PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> On Oct 9, 2017, at 03:00 , David Gibson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 04:08:03PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 10/07/17 03:23, P
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 06:07:28PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > On Oct 9, 2017, at 03:00 , David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 04:08:03PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 10/07/17 03:23, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >>> Hi Rob,
> >>>
> On Oct 6, 2017, a
Hi David,
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 03:00 , David Gibson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 04:08:03PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 10/07/17 03:23, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
On Oct 6, 2017, at 16:55 , Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis An
Hi Frank,
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 02:08 , Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 10/07/17 03:23, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>>> On Oct 6, 2017, at 16:55 , Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> wrote:
Hi Rob,
>
> < snip >
>
eBPF is portable
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 04:08:03PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 10/07/17 03:23, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> >> On Oct 6, 2017, at 16:55 , Rob Herring wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Rob,
>
> < snip >
>
> >>> eBPF is por
On 10/07/17 03:23, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>> On Oct 6, 2017, at 16:55 , Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
< snip >
>>> eBPF is portable, can be serialized after compiling in the schema file
>>> and can be executed in
Hi Rob,
> On Oct 6, 2017, at 16:55 , Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 12:13 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 2017-
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 12:13 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Rob,
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 08:18 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 12:13 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 08:18 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Rob,
> >> >
> >> > On
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 08:18 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Rob,
>> >
>> > On Sun, 2017-10-01 at 17:00 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 08:18 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On Sun, 2017-10-01 at 17:00 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hello again,
> >> >
> >>
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Sun, 2017-10-01 at 17:00 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>> > Hello again,
>> >
>> > Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of
>> > not only
Hi Geert,
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 09:17 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Pantelis,
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
> > # Note that the YAML example must be validated against this binding
> > # to be an accepted entry
>
> Indeed ;-)
>
> > yaml: |
Hi Pantelis,
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> # Note that the YAML example must be validated against this binding
> # to be an accepted entry
Indeed ;-)
> yaml: |
> sk11@0:
> compatible: "skel,sk11"
> reg: 0
> sip-max
Hi Rob,
On Sun, 2017-10-01 at 17:00 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of
> > not only generating yaml from DTS source but also compiling DTS sources
> > a
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 01:00 , Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hello again,
>>
>> Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of
>> not only generating yaml from DTS source but also compiling DTS sources
>> and being almos
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of
> not only generating yaml from DTS source but also compiling DTS sources
> and being almost fully compatible with DTC.
Can you quantify "almost"?
> Com
Hello again,
Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of
not only generating yaml from DTS source but also compiling DTS sources
and being almost fully compatible with DTC.
Compiling the kernel's DTBs using yamldt is as simple as using a
DTC=yamldt.
Error reporting is accu
25 matches
Mail list logo