Sergei Shtylyov writes:
> Hello.
Hi Sergei,
> On 03/10/2016 05:28 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>
>> This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
>> exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
>>
>> No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
>
Paolo Abeni writes:
> On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 09:28 -0500, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
>> exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
>>
>> No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
>> negotiated MTU
Hello.
On 03/10/2016 05:28 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 09:28 -0500, Aaron Conole wrote:
> This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
> exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
>
> No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
> negotiated MTU. A future commit will add pr
This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a
warning is emitted if the guest c
5 matches
Mail list logo