Hi Daniel,
2017-09-18 18:00 GMT+02:00 Daniel Thompson :
> On 14/09/17 11:46, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
>
> So far in these discussions folks have been assuming that if we just
> apply cie1931 to the PWM Duty Cycle then we're done and we have
> perceived brightness in Lumens. ...
On 14/09/17 11:46, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
So far in these discussions folks have been assuming that if we just
apply cie1931 to the PWM Duty Cycle then we're done and we have
perceived brightness in Lumens. ...but I think that's not quite
right. There are more factors. Let's use the datas
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Enric Balletbo Serra
wrote:
> Based on this seems reasonable maintain current implementation to not
> break backward compability. Even, I think makes sense improve current
> implementation by adding somekind of piecewise linear concept to the
> brightness leve
Hi,
2017-09-08 19:39 GMT+02:00 Doug Anderson :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Daniel Thompson
> wrote:
>> On 07/09/17 19:04, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> I'd agree that I don't think we should land Enric's series as-is.
>>> ...but I think something has been missing from the discussion so f
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Daniel Thompson
wrote:
> On 07/09/17 19:04, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> I'd agree that I don't think we should land Enric's series as-is.
>> ...but I think something has been missing from the discussion so far:
>> the fact that the backlight driver doesn't necessar
On 07/09/17 19:04, Doug Anderson wrote:
> I'd agree that I don't think we should land Enric's series as-is.
> ...but I think something has been missing from the discussion so far:
> the fact that the backlight driver doesn't necessarily increase light
> output (in Watts) linearly in response to a
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 7:06 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>
>> On 04/09/17 16:35, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > This patch series is a first RFC to know your opinion about implement
>> > support to create bright
On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 7:06 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
> On 04/09/17 16:35, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > This patch series is a first RFC to know your opinion about implement
> > support to create brightness levels tables dinamically. I tried to argue
> > in every p
On 05/09/17 12:05, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 04/09/17 16:35, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
Dear all,
This patch series is a first RFC to know your opinion about implement
support to create brightness levels tables dinamically. I tried to argue
in every patch the specific reasons we think this c
On 04/09/17 16:35, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
Dear all,
This patch series is a first RFC to know your opinion about implement
support to create brightness levels tables dinamically. I tried to argue
in every patch the specific reasons we think this can be interesting, to
sumup, the idea behin
Dear all,
This patch series is a first RFC to know your opinion about implement
support to create brightness levels tables dinamically. I tried to argue
in every patch the specific reasons we think this can be interesting, to
sumup, the idea behind these patches is be able to pass via device tree
11 matches
Mail list logo
