Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On 14 April 2016 at 00:33, Gwendal Grignou wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> On 2 April 2016 at 02:23, Gwendal Grignou wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Ulf Hansson

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On 14 April 2016 at 00:33, Gwendal Grignou wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> On 2 April 2016 at 02:23, Gwendal Grignou wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Ulf Hansson >> > wrote: >> >> On 28 December 2015 at 15:12, Alex Lemberg >> >> wrote: >> >> > I

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 2 April 2016 at 02:23, Gwendal Grignou wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> On 28 December 2015 at 15:12, Alex Lemberg

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 2 April 2016 at 02:23, Gwendal Grignou wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> On 28 December 2015 at 15:12, Alex Lemberg > >> wrote: > > > I am arriving after the battle, but I have finally rebased the eMMC

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On 2 April 2016 at 02:23, Gwendal Grignou wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 28 December 2015 at 15:12, Alex Lemberg wrote: >>> Hi Ulf, >>> >>> We succeeded to run FFU via new mmc

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On 2 April 2016 at 02:23, Gwendal Grignou wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 28 December 2015 at 15:12, Alex Lemberg wrote: >>> Hi Ulf, >>> >>> We succeeded to run FFU via new mmc multi-command ioctl without any code >>> modification, >>> but only by using

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 28 December 2015 at 15:12, Alex Lemberg wrote: >> Hi Ulf, >> >> We succeeded to run FFU via new mmc multi-command ioctl without any code >> modification, >> but only by using Single Sector

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 28 December 2015 at 15:12, Alex Lemberg wrote: >> Hi Ulf, >> >> We succeeded to run FFU via new mmc multi-command ioctl without any code >> modification, >> but only by using Single Sector commands (CMD24). >> >> From running the FFU and

RE: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

, Alex > -Original Message- > From: Holger Schurig [mailto:holgerschu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 10:15 AM > To: Ulf Hansson > Cc: Avi Shchislowski; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; Alex Lemberg; Chris Ball; Baolin Wang >

RE: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

, Alex > -Original Message- > From: Holger Schurig [mailto:holgerschu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 10:15 AM > To: Ulf Hansson > Cc: Avi Shchislowski; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; Alex Lemberg; Chris Ball; Baolin Wang >

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

[sigh, in cleartext this time.] 2015-12-22 0:57 GMT-08:00 Ulf Hansson : > + Olof (forgot to add him last time) > > On 22 December 2015 at 09:55, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> + Gwendal, Grant, Olof, Seshagiri, Jon >> >> On 22 December 2015 at 09:15, Holger Schurig wrote: >>> Sorry for the delay.

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

+ Olof (forgot to add him last time) On 22 December 2015 at 09:55, Ulf Hansson wrote: > + Gwendal, Grant, Olof, Seshagiri, Jon > > On 22 December 2015 at 09:15, Holger Schurig wrote: >> >>> Sorry for the delay. >> >> No problem, I was busy with many other projects as well. >> >>> My advise

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

+ Gwendal, Grant, Olof, Seshagiri, Jon On 22 December 2015 at 09:15, Holger Schurig wrote: > >> Sorry for the delay. > > No problem, I was busy with many other projects as well. > >> My advise right now is to try this out via the mmc ioctl in userspace, >> yes. Although, if you encounter any

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

> Sorry for the delay. No problem, I was busy with many other projects as well. > My advise right now is to try this out via the mmc ioctl in userspace, > yes. Although, if you encounter any issues with that approach that it > might not be reliable, I am open to look into the in-kernel solution

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

[sigh, in cleartext this time.] 2015-12-22 0:57 GMT-08:00 Ulf Hansson : > + Olof (forgot to add him last time) > > On 22 December 2015 at 09:55, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> + Gwendal, Grant, Olof, Seshagiri, Jon >> >> On 22 December 2015 at 09:15,

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

+ Olof (forgot to add him last time) On 22 December 2015 at 09:55, Ulf Hansson wrote: > + Gwendal, Grant, Olof, Seshagiri, Jon > > On 22 December 2015 at 09:15, Holger Schurig wrote: >> >>> Sorry for the delay. >> >> No problem, I was busy with

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

+ Gwendal, Grant, Olof, Seshagiri, Jon On 22 December 2015 at 09:15, Holger Schurig wrote: > >> Sorry for the delay. > > No problem, I was busy with many other projects as well. > >> My advise right now is to try this out via the mmc ioctl in userspace, >> yes. Although,

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

> Sorry for the delay. No problem, I was busy with many other projects as well. > My advise right now is to try this out via the mmc ioctl in userspace, > yes. Although, if you encounter any issues with that approach that it > might not be reliable, I am open to look into the in-kernel solution

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

+Chris, Baolin On 25 November 2015 at 09:56, Holger Schurig wrote: > We had to modify the last patch a bit and was able to update a Kingston > device from Firmware 0xba to 0xbd. But when doing this in user-space only is > now the way to go, I should probably not submit it anymore? > > BTW, for

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

+Chris, Baolin On 25 November 2015 at 09:56, Holger Schurig wrote: > We had to modify the last patch a bit and was able to update a Kingston > device from Firmware 0xba to 0xbd. But when doing this in user-space only is > now the way to go, I should probably not submit

RE: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

; Avi > Shchislowski; Alex Lemberg > Cc: Holger Schurig > Subject: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update > > There have been some attempts to add FFU (field firmware update). The last > AFAIK in Nov 2014, http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg29324.html > > But it seems that

RE: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

Ulf Hansson; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Avi > Shchislowski; Alex Lemberg > Cc: Holger Schurig > Subject: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update > > There have been some attempts to add FFU (field firmware update). The last > AFAIK in Nov 2014, http://www.spi

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Holger Schurig wrote: > There have been some attempts to add FFU (field firmware update). The last > AFAIK in Nov 2014, http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg29324.html > > But it seems that the committers weren't persistent enought. > > I took the liberty to

Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Holger Schurig wrote: > There have been some attempts to add FFU (field firmware update). The last > AFAIK in Nov 2014, http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg29324.html > > But it seems that the committers weren't persistent enought.

[RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

There have been some attempts to add FFU (field firmware update). The last AFAIK in Nov 2014, http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg29324.html But it seems that the committers weren't persistent enought. I took the liberty to take Avi's patch and make it hopefully maintainer-review

[RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update

There have been some attempts to add FFU (field firmware update). The last AFAIK in Nov 2014, http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg29324.html But it seems that the committers weren't persistent enought. I took the liberty to take Avi's patch and make it hopefully maintainer-review