* Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Andy Lutomirski writes:
> >>
> >> - Lots of people (Linus included) have asked to convert the entry
> >>code to pop registers on exit instead of movqing them off the
> >>stack. This makes a bunch of prog
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>>
>> - Lots of people (Linus included) have asked to convert the entry
>>code to pop registers on exit instead of movqing them off the
>>stack. This makes a bunch of progress in that direction.
>
> You should b
Andy Lutomirski writes:
>
> - Lots of people (Linus included) have asked to convert the entry
>code to pop registers on exit instead of movqing them off the
>stack. This makes a bunch of progress in that direction.
You should benchmark it on Atoms. Likely it's a regression there
because
Hi all-
Here's a pile of entry changes. In brief summary:
- Lots of people (Linus included) have asked to convert the entry
code to pop registers on exit instead of movqing them off the
stack. This makes a bunch of progress in that direction.
- Linux's sp0 handling has annoyed me for a
4 matches
Mail list logo
