Re: [RFC 00/21] Richacls

2015-02-27 Thread Andreas Grünbacher
2015-02-27 23:48 GMT+01:00 J. Bruce Fields : > I remember my main concern being how we collapse the ACL and mask bits > to map a richacl to an NFSv4 (or Samba) ACL. What richacl_apply_masks() in librichacl does and what "richacl --get" without the --raw option displays. The basic algorithms are st

Re: [RFC 00/21] Richacls

2015-02-27 Thread J. Bruce Fields
Thanks for this! On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:41:21AM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > At this point, I would like to ask for your feedback as to what should > be changed before these patches can be merged, even if merging these > patches alone doesn't make a while lot of sense. I will follow up

[RFC 00/21] Richacls

2015-02-25 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
Hello, here is an updated richacl patch queue, also available in git [1]. For those who might not know, richacls are an implementation of NFSv4 ACLs that cleanly integrates into the POSIX file permission model. The goal is to improve interoperability between Linux and other systems, mainly acros

[RFC 00/21] Richacls

2015-02-25 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
Hello, here is an updated richacl patch queue, also available in git [1]. For those who might not know, richacls are an implementation of NFSv4 ACLs that cleanly integrates into the POSIX file permission model. The goal is to improve interoperability between Linux and other systems, mainly acros