On 07/09/17 20:38, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 06/09/17 23:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> Xen PV is fundamentally incompatible with our fancy NMI code: it
>>> doesn't use IST at all, and Xen entries clobber two stack slots
>>> below the hardw
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 06/09/17 23:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Xen PV is fundamentally incompatible with our fancy NMI code: it
>> doesn't use IST at all, and Xen entries clobber two stack slots
>> below the hardware frame.
>>
>> Drop Xen PV support from our NM
On 06/09/17 23:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Xen PV is fundamentally incompatible with our fancy NMI code: it
> doesn't use IST at all, and Xen entries clobber two stack slots
> below the hardware frame.
>
> Drop Xen PV support from our NMI code entirely.
>
> XXX: Juergen: could you write and test
Xen PV is fundamentally incompatible with our fancy NMI code: it
doesn't use IST at all, and Xen entries clobber two stack slots
below the hardware frame.
Drop Xen PV support from our NMI code entirely.
XXX: Juergen: could you write and test the tiny patch needed to
make Xen PV have a xen_nmi ent
4 matches
Mail list logo