On 12/23/2014 10:26 PM, Bibek Basu wrote:
sorry for the delay in responding.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Bill Huang mailto:bilhu...@nvidia.com>> wrote:
On 12/17/2014 10:47 PM, Bibek Basu wrote:
Hi Bill,
Though I like your solution, I have a usecase where the drive
On 12/17/2014 10:47 PM, Bibek Basu wrote:
Hi Bill,
Though I like your solution, I have a usecase where the driver probe
sequence itself is not right. Both the driver are module_init but one
depends on another during suspend sequence.
In such a situation, my system hangs. What do you suggest to
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:50:15AM -0800, Bill Huang wrote:
> The dpm_list was added in the call "device_add" and when we do defer
> probe we'll explicitly move the probed device to be the last in the
> dpm_list, we should do the same for the normal probe since there are
> cases that we won't have
The dpm_list was added in the call "device_add" and when we do defer
probe we'll explicitly move the probed device to be the last in the
dpm_list, we should do the same for the normal probe since there are
cases that we won't have chance to do defer probe to change the PM order
as the below example
4 matches
Mail list logo
