Re: [RFC 1/1 linux-next] udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount

2017-01-20 Thread Jan Kara
On Wed 18-01-17 19:39:35, Fabian Frederick wrote: > udf_fill_super() used udf_parse_options() to flag UDF_FLAG_BLOCKSIZE_SET > when blocksize was specified otherwise used 512 bytes > (bdev_logical_block_size) and 2048 bytes (UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE) > IOW both 1024 and 4096 specifications were requir

[RFC 1/1 linux-next] udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount

2017-01-18 Thread Fabian Frederick
udf_fill_super() used udf_parse_options() to flag UDF_FLAG_BLOCKSIZE_SET when blocksize was specified otherwise used 512 bytes (bdev_logical_block_size) and 2048 bytes (UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE) IOW both 1024 and 4096 specifications were required or resulted in "mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad