Re: [RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.

2018-11-19 Thread Atish Patra
On 11/17/18 8:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:50:07PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote: cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document to a common place. The relevant discussion can be found here.

Re: [RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.

2018-11-19 Thread Atish Patra
On 11/17/18 8:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:50:07PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote: cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document to a common place. The relevant discussion can be found here.

Re: [RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.

2018-11-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:50:07PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote: > cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both > RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document > to a common place. > > The relevant discussion can be found here. >

Re: [RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.

2018-11-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:50:07PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote: > cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both > RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document > to a common place. > > The relevant discussion can be found here. >

[RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.

2018-11-08 Thread Atish Patra
cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document to a common place. The relevant discussion can be found here. https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/6/19 Signed-off-by: Atish Patra ---

[RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.

2018-11-08 Thread Atish Patra
cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document to a common place. The relevant discussion can be found here. https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/6/19 Signed-off-by: Atish Patra ---