Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 25 2007 09:30, WANG Cong wrote: >>> >>>Yes, I found all TABs gone when I received the mail. When I post next >>>version of the patch, I will test to send to me first :-) >>> >>>Thanks for your information. >> >>Blame Gmail. > >I am using gmail too. That's not gmail's fault, Then it is one

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread WANG Cong
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:26:26PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >On May 24 2007 22:47, coly wrote: >> >>Dave, >> >>Yes, I found all TABs gone when I received the mail. When I post next >>version of the patch, I will test to send to me first :-) >> >>Thanks for your information. > >Blame Gmail. >

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 24 2007 22:47, coly wrote: > >Dave, > >Yes, I found all TABs gone when I received the mail. When I post next >version of the patch, I will test to send to me first :-) > >Thanks for your information. Blame Gmail. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread coly
Dave, Yes, I found all TABs gone when I received the mail. When I post next version of the patch, I will test to send to me first :-) Thanks for your information. Coly 在 2007-05-24四的 08:20 -0500,Dave Kleikamp写道: > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 02:06 +0800, coly wrote: > > The patch is generated based

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 02:06 +0800, coly wrote: > The patch is generated based on 2.6.20-ext4-2 branch. you can find the > benchmark from other email. > > DO NOT waste time on reading the patch :-) I post this patch here is to > show that I really spent time on it and the patch can work (even not

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 02:06 +0800, coly wrote: The patch is generated based on 2.6.20-ext4-2 branch. you can find the benchmark from other email. DO NOT waste time on reading the patch :-) I post this patch here is to show that I really spent time on it and the patch can work (even not

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread coly
Dave, Yes, I found all TABs gone when I received the mail. When I post next version of the patch, I will test to send to me first :-) Thanks for your information. Coly 在 2007-05-24四的 08:20 -0500,Dave Kleikamp写道: On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 02:06 +0800, coly wrote: The patch is generated based on

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 24 2007 22:47, coly wrote: Dave, Yes, I found all TABs gone when I received the mail. When I post next version of the patch, I will test to send to me first :-) Thanks for your information. Blame Gmail. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread WANG Cong
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:26:26PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On May 24 2007 22:47, coly wrote: Dave, Yes, I found all TABs gone when I received the mail. When I post next version of the patch, I will test to send to me first :-) Thanks for your information. Blame Gmail. Jan I am

Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-24 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 25 2007 09:30, WANG Cong wrote: Yes, I found all TABs gone when I received the mail. When I post next version of the patch, I will test to send to me first :-) Thanks for your information. Blame Gmail. I am using gmail too. That's not gmail's fault, Then it is one of these: - gmail's

[RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-23 Thread coly
The patch is generated based on 2.6.20-ext4-2 branch. you can find the benchmark from other email. DO NOT waste time on reading the patch :-) I post this patch here is to show that I really spent time on it and the patch can work (even not well). diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index

[RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)

2007-05-23 Thread coly
The patch is generated based on 2.6.20-ext4-2 branch. you can find the benchmark from other email. DO NOT waste time on reading the patch :-) I post this patch here is to show that I really spent time on it and the patch can work (even not well). diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index