bacause both mem_cgroup_try_charge and mem_cgroup_try_charg_memcg
do the same thing. mem_cgroup_try_charge tries to safe one css_tryget
because it relies on the fact that the stock consumption disables
preemption while checking the memcg so it either sees an alive memcg or
NULL.
The css_tryget doesn't seem to be a bottleneck anymore (after
per-cpu reference counting has been merged) so let's make the
code simpler and easier to understand and move consume_stock into
__mem_cgroup_try_charge_memcg where it logically belongs.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 20 ++++----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 509bb59f4744..3f01dc9aa101 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2678,6 +2678,9 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask,
        if (unlikely(task_in_memcg_oom(current)))
                goto nomem;
 
+       if (consume_stock(memcg, nr_pages))
+               return 0;
+
        if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
                oom = false;
 
@@ -2772,18 +2775,6 @@ static struct mem_cgroup 
*mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
                        rcu_read_unlock();
                        goto bypass;
                }
-               if (consume_stock(memcg, nr_pages)) {
-                       /*
-                        * It seems dagerous to access memcg without css_get().
-                        * But considering how consume_stok works, it's not
-                        * necessary. If consume_stock success, some charges
-                        * from this memcg are cached on this cpu. So, we
-                        * don't need to call css_get()/css_tryget() before
-                        * calling consume_stock().
-                        */
-                       rcu_read_unlock();
-                       goto done;
-               }
                /* after here, we may be blocked. we need to get refcnt */
        } while(!css_tryget(&memcg->css));
        rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -2794,7 +2785,7 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(struct 
mm_struct *mm,
                goto bypass;
        else if (ret == -ENOMEM)
                memcg = NULL;
-done:
+
        return memcg;
 bypass:
        return root_mem_cgroup;
@@ -2812,9 +2803,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_try_charge_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask,
        if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg) || mem_cgroup_bypass_charge())
                return -EINTR;
 
-       if (consume_stock(memcg, nr_pages))
-               return 0;
-
        return __mem_cgroup_try_charge_memcg(gfp_mask, nr_pages, memcg, oom);
 }
 
-- 
1.8.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to