The pcm_mmcfg_list is traversed with list_for_each_entry_rcu without a
reader-lock held, because the pci_mmcfg_lock is already held. Make this
known to the list macro so that it fixes new lockdep warnings that
trigger due to lockdep checks added to list_for_each_entry_rcu().
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <j...@joelfernandes.org>
---
arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
index 7389db538c30..6fa42e9c4e6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
static bool pci_mmcfg_running_state;
static bool pci_mmcfg_arch_init_failed;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_mmcfg_lock);
+#define pci_mmcfg_lock_held() lock_is_held(&(pci_mmcfg_lock).dep_map)
LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list);
@@ -54,7 +55,7 @@ static void list_add_sorted(struct pci_mmcfg_region *new)
struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
/* keep list sorted by segment and starting bus number */
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list,
pci_mmcfg_lock_held()) {
if (cfg->segment > new->segment ||
(cfg->segment == new->segment &&
cfg->start_bus >= new->start_bus)) {
@@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ struct pci_mmcfg_region *pci_mmconfig_lookup(int segment,
int bus)
{
struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list)
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list,
pci_mmcfg_lock_held())
if (cfg->segment == segment &&
cfg->start_bus <= bus && bus <= cfg->end_bus)
return cfg;
--
2.22.0.rc1.311.g5d7573a151-goog
