Re: [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier

the taken approach? > > > > BR - Jose Bollo > > > > [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier > > > > The name 'pui' is choosen -instead of puid- > > to avoid confusion with either pid and uid. > > It is intended to identify uniquely each >

Re: [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier

the taken approach? > > > > BR - Jose Bollo > > > > [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier > > > > The name 'pui' is choosen -instead of puid- > > to avoid confusion with either pid and uid. > > It is intended to identify uniquely each >

Re: [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier

Jose Bollo wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to get your feeling about the idea > exposed in that draft. Should continue or stop > immediately? Is there already some existing work? > How is the taken approach? > > BR - Jose Bollo > > [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic

Re: [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier

Jose Bollo wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to get your feeling about the idea > exposed in that draft. Should continue or stop > immediately? Is there already some existing work? > How is the taken approach? > > BR - Jose Bollo > > [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic

[RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier

From: José Bollo <jo...@nonadev.net> Hi all, I'd like to get your feeling about the idea exposed in that draft. Should continue or stop immediately? Is there already some existing work? How is the taken approach? BR - José Bollo [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier The nam

[RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier

From: José Bollo Hi all, I'd like to get your feeling about the idea exposed in that draft. Should continue or stop immediately? Is there already some existing work? How is the taken approach? BR - José Bollo [RFC DRAFT] Adds PUI: process unic identifier The name 'pui' is choosen -instead