On 04/22/2015 07:57 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 21-04-15 13:05:30, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 04/21/2015 12:34 PM, Ming Lin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 04/21/2015 11:09 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
Hi Jens,
This RFC DRAFT patch is on top of your "[PATCH v2] Support for wr
On Tue 21-04-15 13:05:30, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 12:34 PM, Ming Lin wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>On 04/21/2015 11:09 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Hi Jens,
> >>>
> >>>This RFC DRAFT patch is on top of your "[PATCH v2] Support for write
> >>>stream I
On 04/21/2015 12:34 PM, Ming Lin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 04/21/2015 11:09 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
Hi Jens,
This RFC DRAFT patch is on top of your "[PATCH v2] Support for write
stream IDs"
I throw it out early to get comments if it's the way to go.
Quote LWN
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 11:09 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> This RFC DRAFT patch is on top of your "[PATCH v2] Support for write
>> stream IDs"
>> I throw it out early to get comments if it's the way to go.
>>
>> Quote LWN(http://lwn.net/Artic
On 04/21/2015 11:09 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
Hi Jens,
This RFC DRAFT patch is on top of your "[PATCH v2] Support for write stream IDs"
I throw it out early to get comments if it's the way to go.
Quote LWN(http://lwn.net/Articles/638722):
"There would be clear value in a closer association between s
Hi Jens,
This RFC DRAFT patch is on top of your "[PATCH v2] Support for write stream IDs"
I throw it out early to get comments if it's the way to go.
Quote LWN(http://lwn.net/Articles/638722):
"There would be clear value in a closer association between stream IDs
and specific buffered-write oper
6 matches
Mail list logo
