Hi Ben,
On 2021/4/14 0:43, Ben Gardon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:39 AM Keqian Zhu wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2021/4/13 1:19, Ben Gardon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:42 PM Sean Christopherson
>>> wrote:
+Ben
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021, Keqian Zhu wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:39 AM Keqian Zhu wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/4/13 1:19, Ben Gardon wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:42 PM Sean Christopherson
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> +Ben
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021, Keqian Zhu wrote:
> >>> Hi Paolo,
> >>>
> >>> I plan to rework this patch and do full
On 2021/4/13 1:19, Ben Gardon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:42 PM Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>
>> +Ben
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>>> Hi Paolo,
>>>
>>> I plan to rework this patch and do full test. What do you think about this
>>> idea
>>> (enable dirty logging for
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:42 PM Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> +Ben
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021, Keqian Zhu wrote:
> > Hi Paolo,
> >
> > I plan to rework this patch and do full test. What do you think about this
> > idea
> > (enable dirty logging for huge pages lazily)?
>
> Ben, don't you also have
Hi Sean,
On 2021/4/8 23:52, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> Do you have any similar idea that can share with us?
>
> Doh, Ben is out this week, he'll be back Monday. Sorry for gumming up the
> works :-/
Please don't mind. I'm glad we can
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021, Keqian Zhu wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Do you have any similar idea that can share with us?
Doh, Ben is out this week, he'll be back Monday. Sorry for gumming up the
works :-/
Hi Ben,
Do you have any similar idea that can share with us?
Thanks
Keqian
On 2021/4/7 7:42, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +Ben
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> I plan to rework this patch and do full test. What do you think about this
>> idea
>> (enable dirty
+Ben
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021, Keqian Zhu wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> I plan to rework this patch and do full test. What do you think about this
> idea
> (enable dirty logging for huge pages lazily)?
Ben, don't you also have something similar (or maybe the exact opposite?) in the
hopper? This sounds
Hi Paolo,
I plan to rework this patch and do full test. What do you think about this idea
(enable dirty logging for huge pages lazily)?
Best Regards,
Keqian
PS: As dirty log of TDP MMU has been supported, I should add more code.
On 2020/8/28 16:11, Keqian Zhu wrote:
> Currently during enable
Currently during enable dirty logging, if we're with init-all-set,
we just write protect huge pages and leave normal pages untouched,
for that we can enable dirty logging for these pages lazily.
It seems that enable dirty logging lazily for huge pages is feasible
too, which not only reduces the
10 matches
Mail list logo
