Hi Robert,
On 04/05/18 13:27, Robert Richter wrote:
On 04.05.18 12:03:12, Matt Redfearn wrote:
As said, oprofile version 0.9.x is still available for cpus that do
not support perf. What is the breakage?
The breakage I originally set out to fix was the MT support in perf.
Hi Robert,
On 04/05/18 13:27, Robert Richter wrote:
On 04.05.18 12:03:12, Matt Redfearn wrote:
As said, oprofile version 0.9.x is still available for cpus that do
not support perf. What is the breakage?
The breakage I originally set out to fix was the MT support in perf.
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:27:51PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 04.05.18 12:03:12, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> > >As said, oprofile version 0.9.x is still available for cpus that do
> > >not support perf. What is the breakage?
> >
> > The breakage I originally set out to fix was the MT support
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:27:51PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 04.05.18 12:03:12, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> > >As said, oprofile version 0.9.x is still available for cpus that do
> > >not support perf. What is the breakage?
> >
> > The breakage I originally set out to fix was the MT support
On 04.05.18 12:03:12, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> >As said, oprofile version 0.9.x is still available for cpus that do
> >not support perf. What is the breakage?
>
> The breakage I originally set out to fix was the MT support in perf.
>
On 04.05.18 12:03:12, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> >As said, oprofile version 0.9.x is still available for cpus that do
> >not support perf. What is the breakage?
>
> The breakage I originally set out to fix was the MT support in perf.
>
Hi Robert,
On 04/05/18 11:26, Robert Richter wrote:
On 04.05.18 10:54:32, Matt Redfearn wrote:
perf is available for MIPS and supports many more CPU types than oprofile.
oprofile userspace seemingly has been broken since 1.0.0 - removing oprofile
support from the MIPS kernel would not break it
Hi Robert,
On 04/05/18 11:26, Robert Richter wrote:
On 04.05.18 10:54:32, Matt Redfearn wrote:
perf is available for MIPS and supports many more CPU types than oprofile.
oprofile userspace seemingly has been broken since 1.0.0 - removing oprofile
support from the MIPS kernel would not break it
On 04.05.18 10:54:32, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> perf is available for MIPS and supports many more CPU types than oprofile.
> oprofile userspace seemingly has been broken since 1.0.0 - removing oprofile
> support from the MIPS kernel would not break it more thatn it already is,
What do you mean with
On 04.05.18 10:54:32, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> perf is available for MIPS and supports many more CPU types than oprofile.
> oprofile userspace seemingly has been broken since 1.0.0 - removing oprofile
> support from the MIPS kernel would not break it more thatn it already is,
What do you mean with
Hi Robert,
On 04/05/18 10:30, Robert Richter wrote:
On 24.04.18 14:15:58, Matt Redfearn wrote:
On 24/04/18 14:05, James Hogan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
Since it appears that MIPS oprofile support is currently broken, core
oprofile is not getting
Hi Robert,
On 04/05/18 10:30, Robert Richter wrote:
On 24.04.18 14:15:58, Matt Redfearn wrote:
On 24/04/18 14:05, James Hogan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
Since it appears that MIPS oprofile support is currently broken, core
oprofile is not getting
On 24.04.18 14:15:58, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> On 24/04/18 14:05, James Hogan wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> >>Since it appears that MIPS oprofile support is currently broken, core
> >>oprofile is not getting many updates and not as many architectures
>
On 24.04.18 14:15:58, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> On 24/04/18 14:05, James Hogan wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> >>Since it appears that MIPS oprofile support is currently broken, core
> >>oprofile is not getting many updates and not as many architectures
>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> The core oprofile code in drivers/oprofile/ has not seeen significant
> maintenance other than fixes to changes in other parts of the tree for
> the last 5 years at least. It looks as through the perf tool has
> more or less
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> The core oprofile code in drivers/oprofile/ has not seeen significant
> maintenance other than fixes to changes in other parts of the tree for
> the last 5 years at least. It looks as through the perf tool has
> more or less
On 24/04/18 14:05, James Hogan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
Since it appears that MIPS oprofile support is currently broken, core
oprofile is not getting many updates and not as many architectures
implement support for it compared to perf, remove the
On 24/04/18 14:05, James Hogan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
Since it appears that MIPS oprofile support is currently broken, core
oprofile is not getting many updates and not as many architectures
implement support for it compared to perf, remove the
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> Since it appears that MIPS oprofile support is currently broken, core
> oprofile is not getting many updates and not as many architectures
> implement support for it compared to perf, remove the MIPS support.
That sounds reasonable
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> Since it appears that MIPS oprofile support is currently broken, core
> oprofile is not getting many updates and not as many architectures
> implement support for it compared to perf, remove the MIPS support.
That sounds reasonable
The core oprofile code in drivers/oprofile/ has not seeen significant
maintenance other than fixes to changes in other parts of the tree for
the last 5 years at least. It looks as through the perf tool has
more or less superceeded it's functionality.
Additionally the MIPS architecture support has
The core oprofile code in drivers/oprofile/ has not seeen significant
maintenance other than fixes to changes in other parts of the tree for
the last 5 years at least. It looks as through the perf tool has
more or less superceeded it's functionality.
Additionally the MIPS architecture support has
22 matches
Mail list logo
