On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:32:00PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>
>
> On 30/12/15 11:31, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 12/30/2015 09:06 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >>
> >> Also note that I don't want new fbdev drivers into the mainline kernel.
> >> You should implement a DRM based dr
On 30/12/15 11:31, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/30/2015 09:06 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>
>> Also note that I don't want new fbdev drivers into the mainline kernel.
>> You should implement a DRM based driver instead.
>>
>
> Thanks, is there a porting guide to go from fbdev to DRM?
I
Hi,
On 12/30/2015 09:06 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Also note that I don't want new fbdev drivers into the mainline kernel.
You should implement a DRM based driver instead.
Thanks, is there a porting guide to go from fbdev to DRM?
Does DRM provides a "fbdev" backward compatible API? Would that
Hi,
On 29/12/15 18:51, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> On 12/29/2015 03:16 PM, Frans Klaver wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Sebastian Frias
>> wrote:
>>> Right now we don't know if the driver will be upstreamed.
>>> Let me rephrase my question:
>>>
>>> - how would you recommend enabling FB_CF
On 12/29/2015 03:16 PM, Frans Klaver wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Sebastian Frias wrote:
Right now we don't know if the driver will be upstreamed.
Let me rephrase my question:
- how would you recommend enabling FB_CFB_FILLRECT, FB_CFB_COPYAREA and
FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT for a driver that
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> On 12/29/2015 02:49 PM, Frans Klaver wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Sebastian Frias wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are wondering what is the recommended way of adding support for a
>>> framebuffer driver on the Linux kernel.
il the driver is upstreamed, but we would like to avoid that, hence
the question.
Subject: [RFC PATCH] fbdev: add support for Sigma Designs' smp8xxxfb.ko
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Frias
---
drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/dri
ggestions to improve it.
Is the below patch really a patch you intend to upstream, or are you
just wondering about what your Kconfig entry should look like when you
upstream your driver?
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] fbdev: add support for Sigma Designs' smp8xxxfb.ko
>
> Signed-off-b
e patch below is the way to go
with it or if you have suggestions to improve it.
Thanks in advance,
Sebastian
-- >8 --
Subject: [RFC PATCH] fbdev: add support for Sigma Designs' smp8xxxfb.ko
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Frias
---
drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 10 ++
1 file c
9 matches
Mail list logo