2014-11-26 21:43 GMT+09:00 Andrew Morton :
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:37:54 +0900 Jungseung Lee wrote:
>
>> 2014-11-26 15:51 GMT+09:00 Jungseung Lee :
>>
>> >>> @@ -2093,7 +2083,20 @@ static int elf_core_dump(struct coredump_params
>> >>> *cprm)
>> >>>
>> >>> dataoff = offset = roundup(offset
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:37:54 +0900 Jungseung Lee wrote:
> 2014-11-26 15:51 GMT+09:00 Jungseung Lee :
>
> >>> @@ -2093,7 +2083,20 @@ static int elf_core_dump(struct coredump_params
> >>> *cprm)
> >>>
> >>> dataoff = offset = roundup(offset, ELF_EXEC_PAGESIZE);
> >>>
> >>> - offset += e
2014-11-26 15:51 GMT+09:00 Jungseung Lee :
>>> @@ -2093,7 +2083,20 @@ static int elf_core_dump(struct coredump_params
>>> *cprm)
>>>
>>> dataoff = offset = roundup(offset, ELF_EXEC_PAGESIZE);
>>>
>>> - offset += elf_core_vma_data_size(gate_vma, cprm->mm_flags);
>>> + vma_filesz = km
Hello, Andrew.
2014-11-26 6:38 GMT+09:00 Andrew Morton :
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 04:16:39 +0900 Jungseung Lee wrote:
>
>> vma_dump_size() has been used several times on actual dumper
>> and it is supposed to be same values for same vma.
>> But vma_dump_size() could be different, while coredump is p
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 04:16:39 +0900 Jungseung Lee wrote:
> vma_dump_size() has been used several times on actual dumper
> and it is supposed to be same values for same vma.
> But vma_dump_size() could be different, while coredump is procceeded.
> (e.g. remove shared memory)
>
> In that case, head
vma_dump_size() has been used several times on actual dumper
and it is supposed to be same values for same vma.
But vma_dump_size() could be different, while coredump is procceeded.
(e.g. remove shared memory)
In that case, header info and vma size could be inconsistent
and it cause wrong coredump
6 matches
Mail list logo
