On 2016/11/4 3:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:08:31 +0800 zhongjiang wrote:
>
>> From: zhong jiang
>>
>> Since 'commit 3e89e1c5ea84 ("hugetlb: make mm and fs code explicitly
>> non-modular")'
>> bring in the mainline. mount hugetlbfs will result in the following issue.
>>
>> m
[Re: [RFC PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix the hugetlbfs can not be mounted] On 03/11/2016
(Thu 12:17) Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:08:31 +0800 zhongjiang wrote:
>
> > From: zhong jiang
> >
> > Since 'commit 3e89e1c5ea84 ("hugetlb: make mm and f
On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:08:31 +0800 zhongjiang wrote:
> From: zhong jiang
>
> Since 'commit 3e89e1c5ea84 ("hugetlb: make mm and fs code explicitly
> non-modular")'
> bring in the mainline. mount hugetlbfs will result in the following issue.
>
> mount: unknown filesystme type 'hugetlbfs'
>
> b
On 2016/10/29 14:08, zhongjiang wrote:
> From: zhong jiang
>
> Since 'commit 3e89e1c5ea84 ("hugetlb: make mm and fs code explicitly
> non-modular")'
> bring in the mainline. mount hugetlbfs will result in the following issue.
>
> mount: unknown filesystme type 'hugetlbfs'
>
> because previous pat
From: zhong jiang
Since 'commit 3e89e1c5ea84 ("hugetlb: make mm and fs code explicitly
non-modular")'
bring in the mainline. mount hugetlbfs will result in the following issue.
mount: unknown filesystme type 'hugetlbfs'
because previous patch remove the module_alias_fs, when we mount the fs ty
5 matches
Mail list logo