On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:27:54PM +0100, Marco Pagani wrote:
>
> On 2024-01-30 21:47, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > It very much sounds like there is a desire to have this but without a
> > user, there is no justification.
>
> I was working on a set of patches to fix an issue in the fpga
On 2024-01-30 21:47, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:36:14PM +0100, Marco Pagani wrote:
>> The current implementation of try_module_get() requires the module to
>> exist and be live as a precondition. While this may seem intuitive at
>> first glance, enforcing the
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:36:14PM +0100, Marco Pagani wrote:
> The current implementation of try_module_get() requires the module to
> exist and be live as a precondition. While this may seem intuitive at
> first glance, enforcing the precondition can be tricky, considering that
> modules can be
The current implementation of try_module_get() requires the module to
exist and be live as a precondition. While this may seem intuitive at
first glance, enforcing the precondition can be tricky, considering that
modules can be unloaded at any time if not previously taken. For
instance, the caller
4 matches
Mail list logo
