On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Qian Cai wrote:
> > The cmpxchg failures could likely be more generalized beyond SLUB since
> > there will be other dependencies in the kernel than just this allocator.
>
> OK, SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST is fine to keep around and maybe be turned into a
> Kconfig option to make
On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 11:32 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Qian Cai wrote:
>
> > SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST and SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG look like some left-over
> > debugging code during the internal development that probably nobody uses
> > it anymore. Remove them to make the world
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:32 AM David Rientjes wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Qian Cai wrote:
>
> > SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST and SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG look like some left-over
> > debugging code during the internal development that probably nobody uses
> > it anymore. Remove them to make the world
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Qian Cai wrote:
> SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST and SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG look like some left-over
> debugging code during the internal development that probably nobody uses
> it anymore. Remove them to make the world greener.
Adding Pengfei Li who has been working on a patchset for
SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST and SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG look like some left-over
debugging code during the internal development that probably nobody uses
it anymore. Remove them to make the world greener.
---
mm/slub.c | 110 --
1 file changed, 110
5 matches
Mail list logo