Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/slub: remove left-over debugging code

2019-09-17 Thread David Rientjes
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Qian Cai wrote: > > The cmpxchg failures could likely be more generalized beyond SLUB since > > there will be other dependencies in the kernel than just this allocator. > > OK, SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST is fine to keep around and maybe be turned into a > Kconfig option to make

Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/slub: remove left-over debugging code

2019-09-17 Thread Qian Cai
On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 11:32 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Qian Cai wrote: > > > SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST and SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG look like some left-over > > debugging code during the internal development that probably nobody uses > > it anymore. Remove them to make the world

Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/slub: remove left-over debugging code

2019-09-17 Thread Pengfei Li
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:32 AM David Rientjes wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Qian Cai wrote: > > > SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST and SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG look like some left-over > > debugging code during the internal development that probably nobody uses > > it anymore. Remove them to make the world

Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/slub: remove left-over debugging code

2019-09-16 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Qian Cai wrote: > SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST and SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG look like some left-over > debugging code during the internal development that probably nobody uses > it anymore. Remove them to make the world greener. Adding Pengfei Li who has been working on a patchset for

[RFC PATCH] mm/slub: remove left-over debugging code

2019-09-16 Thread Qian Cai
SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST and SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG look like some left-over debugging code during the internal development that probably nobody uses it anymore. Remove them to make the world greener. --- mm/slub.c | 110 -- 1 file changed, 110