On 12/18/2013 10:08 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>>
>>> The flow
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> Yes , in it's current state it's broken. But maybe we can try to fix
>>> it instead of arbitrarily removing it. Please see my patches on
>>> plumbing RFS into tuntap which may start to make it useful.
>> Do you mean you patch [5/5] tun: Adde
>> Yes , in it's current state it's broken. But maybe we can try to fix
>> it instead of arbitrarily removing it. Please see my patches on
>> plumbing RFS into tuntap which may start to make it useful.
> Do you mean you patch [5/5] tun: Added support for RFS on tun flows?
> Sorry, can you say with
HI, Tom,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
>>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow control
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> > On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it u
On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> > On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>> >>
>>> >> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>>> >> growth issues and DoS attacks, so t
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
>> the tuntap driver, and
On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow control.
NACK.
T
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 23:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:26:22 +0800
> Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>
> > From: Zhi Yong Wu
> >
> > The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> > growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it f
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:26:22 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow cont
From: Zhi Yong Wu
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow control.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 208 ++
12 matches
Mail list logo
