On 12/18/2013 10:08 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>>
>>> The
On 12/18/2013 10:08 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> Yes , in it's current state it's broken. But maybe we can try to fix
>>> it instead of arbitrarily removing it. Please see my patches on
>>> plumbing RFS into tuntap which may start to make it useful.
>> Do you mean you patch [5/5] tun:
>> Yes , in it's current state it's broken. But maybe we can try to fix
>> it instead of arbitrarily removing it. Please see my patches on
>> plumbing RFS into tuntap which may start to make it useful.
> Do you mean you patch [5/5] tun: Added support for RFS on tun flows?
> Sorry, can you say with
HI, Tom,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
>>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> > On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it
On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> > On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>> >>
>>> >> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>>> >> growth issues and DoS attacks, so
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
>> the tuntap driver, and
On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow control.
NACK.
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 23:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:26:22 +0800
> Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>
> > From: Zhi Yong Wu
> >
> > The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> > growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 23:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:26:22 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS attacks, so
On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove
On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
the tuntap driver, and
HI, Tom,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Tom Herbert therb...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS
Yes , in it's current state it's broken. But maybe we can try to fix
it instead of arbitrarily removing it. Please see my patches on
plumbing RFS into tuntap which may start to make it useful.
Do you mean you patch [5/5] tun: Added support for RFS on tun flows?
Sorry, can you say with more
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Tom Herbert therb...@google.com wrote:
Yes , in it's current state it's broken. But maybe we can try to fix
it instead of arbitrarily removing it. Please see my patches on
plumbing RFS into tuntap which may start to make it useful.
Do you mean you patch [5/5]
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:26:22 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow
From: Zhi Yong Wu
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow control.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 208
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow control.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:26:22 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
the tuntap driver, and
24 matches
Mail list logo
