From: Harish Jenny Kandiga Nagaraj
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:49:59 +0530
> If that is the case , then subscriptions of netlink_sock should have
> been updated after netlink_remove or netlink_release. I don't see
> that happening.
Please do not top-post. First provide the quoted context, then pr
If that is the case , then subscriptions of netlink_sock should have been
updated after netlink_remove or netlink_release.
I don't see that happening.
On Wednesday 03 September 2014 12:22 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Harish Jenny Kandiga Nagaraj
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:14:38 +0530
>
>> In
From: Harish Jenny Kandiga Nagaraj
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:14:38 +0530
> In one of our random test runs we observed the crash mentioned in the
> previous mail.
>
> After debugging we found out that the call flow of the inline and static
> functions were
> netlink_release
> -netlink_remove
In one of our random test runs we observed the crash mentioned in the previous
mail.
After debugging we found out that the call flow of the inline and static
functions were
netlink_release
-netlink_remove
-__sk_del_bind_node
--__hlist_del
*pprev was NULL in __hlist_del f
4 matches
Mail list logo