Re: [RFC PATCH] pwm: Add the concept of an "active" pinctrl

2014-10-07 Thread Doug Anderson
Linus, On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Linus Walleij >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Doug Anderson >>> wrote: > >>> The device core will handle three states for yo

Re: [RFC PATCH] pwm: Add the concept of an "active" pinctrl

2014-10-07 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Linus Walleij > wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> The device core will handle three states for you: "default", "sleep", "idle". > > Except it will handle only one state un

Re: [RFC PATCH] pwm: Add the concept of an "active" pinctrl

2014-09-25 Thread Doug Anderson
Linus, On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> There are cases where you really don't want a PWM's pinctrl to take >> effect until you know that the PWM is driving at the proper rate. A >> good example of this is a PWM-

Re: [RFC PATCH] pwm: Add the concept of an "active" pinctrl

2014-09-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > There are cases where you really don't want a PWM's pinctrl to take > effect until you know that the PWM is driving at the proper rate. A > good example of this is a PWM-controlled regulator, where the boot > state of the pin (maybe a pulle

[RFC PATCH] pwm: Add the concept of an "active" pinctrl

2014-09-23 Thread Doug Anderson
There are cases where you really don't want a PWM's pinctrl to take effect until you know that the PWM is driving at the proper rate. A good example of this is a PWM-controlled regulator, where the boot state of the pin (maybe a pulled down input) could cause a vastly different voltage to take eff