Excerpts from Alex Xu (Hello71)'s message of December 15, 2020 2:03 pm:
> bzip2 is either slower or larger than every other supported algorithm,
> according to benchmarks at [0]. It is far slower to decompress than any
> other algorithm, and still larger than lzma, xz, and zstd.
>
> [0] https://lo
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:03:15PM -0500, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote:
> bzip2 is either slower or larger than every other supported algorithm,
> according to benchmarks at [0]. It is far slower to decompress than any
> other algorithm, and still larger than lzma, xz, and zstd.
>
> [0] https:/
bzip2 is either slower or larger than every other supported algorithm,
according to benchmarks at [0]. It is far slower to decompress than any
other algorithm, and still larger than lzma, xz, and zstd.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1588791882.08g1378g67.none@localhost/
Signed-off-by: Alex Xu (
Am 2020-11-17 23:32, schrieb Alex Xu (Hello71):
bzip2 is either slower or larger than every other supported algorithm,
according to benchmarks at [0]. It is far slower to decompress than any
other algorithm, and still larger than lzma, xz, and zstd.
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/D
bzip2 is either slower or larger than every other supported algorithm,
according to benchmarks at [0]. It is far slower to decompress than any
other algorithm, and still larger than lzma, xz, and zstd.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1588791882.08g1378g67.none@localhost/
Signed-off-by: Alex Xu (
5 matches
Mail list logo
