On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 21:29 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 09:28:09PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:40:56PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > Recent patches for UIO have been attempting to add MSI/X support,
> > > which unfortunately i
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 09:28:09PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:40:56PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Recent patches for UIO have been attempting to add MSI/X support,
> > which unfortunately implies DMA support, which users have been
> > enabling anyway, but wa
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:40:56PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Recent patches for UIO have been attempting to add MSI/X support,
> which unfortunately implies DMA support, which users have been
> enabling anyway, but was never intended for UIO. VFIO on the other
> hand expects an IOMMU to prov
undation.org;
> h...@hansjkoch.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] VFIO no-iommu
>
> Recent patches for UIO have been attempting to add MSI/X support, which
> unfortunately implies DMA support, which users have been enabling anyway, but
> was never intended for UI
...@cloudius-systems.com; step...@networkplumber.org;
vl...@cloudius-systems.com; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
h...@hansjkoch.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] VFIO no-iommu
Recent patches for UIO have been attempting to add MSI/X support, which
unfortunately implies DMA
Recent patches for UIO have been attempting to add MSI/X support,
which unfortunately implies DMA support, which users have been
enabling anyway, but was never intended for UIO. VFIO on the other
hand expects an IOMMU to provide isolation of devices, but provides
a much more complete device interf
6 matches
Mail list logo
