On 6/10/20 1:35 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:06:58PM -0700, Kyung Min Park wrote:
>> Include two instances of features for which there are not implemented
>> use cases in the kernel.
>>
>> Patch 1 creates a new documentation for /proc/cpuinfo flags bits.
>> Patch 2 adds X
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:06:58PM -0700, Kyung Min Park wrote:
> This RFC series has been reviewed by Dave Hansen.
Then why isn't there a "Reviewed-by:" line with his name on it on the
patches?
Come on, you all know how to do this properly...
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:06:58PM -0700, Kyung Min Park wrote:
> Include two instances of features for which there are not implemented
> use cases in the kernel.
>
> Patch 1 creates a new documentation for /proc/cpuinfo flags bits.
> Patch 2 adds X86_FEATURE_SERIALIZE.
> Patch 3 adds X86_FEATURE_
Currently, there isn't any documentation in the kernel about how
/proc/cpuinfo flags are generated and what it means when they are
missing. x86 maintainers have expressed objections on adding flags
for features without kernel use cases and that part of the reason is
the lack of documentation on the
4 matches
Mail list logo
