Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] irq: Fix stack overflow due to softirq called on current stack

2013-09-19 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
2013/9/18 Paul Mackerras : > Frederic, > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 05:33:21PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> >> This series is a proposition to fix the crash reported here: >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378330796.4321.50.camel%40pasglop >> And it has the upside to also consolidate a bit the a

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] irq: Fix stack overflow due to softirq called on current stack

2013-09-17 Thread Paul Mackerras
Frederic, On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 05:33:21PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > This series is a proposition to fix the crash reported here: > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378330796.4321.50.camel%40pasglop > And it has the upside to also consolidate a bit the arch do_softirq overriden > impleme

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] irq: Fix stack overflow due to softirq called on current stack

2013-09-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 17:33 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Hi, > > This series is a proposition to fix the crash reported here: > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378330796.4321.50.camel%40pasglop > And it has the upside to also consolidate a bit the arch do_softirq overriden > implementation. >

[RFC PATCH 0/3] irq: Fix stack overflow due to softirq called on current stack

2013-09-05 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
Hi, This series is a proposition to fix the crash reported here: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378330796.4321.50.camel%40pasglop And it has the upside to also consolidate a bit the arch do_softirq overriden implementation. Only tested in x86-64 for now. Thanks. Frederic Weisbecker (3): irq: Con