On wto, 2013-08-06 at 17:16 +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 02:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > This reclaim process is different than zbud_reclaim_page(). It acts more
> > like swapoff() by trying to unuse pages stored in zbud page and bring
> > them back to memory. The standard
On 08/06/2013 02:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently zbud pages are not movable and they cannot be allocated from CMA
> region. These patches try to address the problem by:
> 1. Adding a new form of reclaim of zbud pages.
> 2. Reclaiming zbud pages during migration and
Hi,
Currently zbud pages are not movable and they cannot be allocated from CMA
region. These patches try to address the problem by:
1. Adding a new form of reclaim of zbud pages.
2. Reclaiming zbud pages during migration and compaction.
3. Allocating zbud pages with __GFP_RECLAIMABLE flag.
This
Hi,
Currently zbud pages are not movable and they cannot be allocated from CMA
region. These patches try to address the problem by:
1. Adding a new form of reclaim of zbud pages.
2. Reclaiming zbud pages during migration and compaction.
3. Allocating zbud pages with __GFP_RECLAIMABLE flag.
This
On 08/06/2013 02:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Hi,
Currently zbud pages are not movable and they cannot be allocated from CMA
region. These patches try to address the problem by:
1. Adding a new form of reclaim of zbud pages.
2. Reclaiming zbud pages during migration and compaction.
3.
On wto, 2013-08-06 at 17:16 +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/06/2013 02:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
This reclaim process is different than zbud_reclaim_page(). It acts more
like swapoff() by trying to unuse pages stored in zbud page and bring
them back to memory. The standard
6 matches
Mail list logo
