On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:23:03AM -0700, Frank Filz wrote:
> > http://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2
> > > > .html
> > > >
> > > > See the section entitled "First Implementation Past the Post".
> > >
> > > Interesting that Jeremy actually suggested the implementation
> http://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2
> > > .html
> > >
> > > See the section entitled "First Implementation Past the Post".
> >
> > Interesting that Jeremy actually suggested the implementation should
> > have had an arbitrary lock owner as part of the flock struct
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:12:03AM -0700, Frank Filz wrote:
> > This blog post of Jeremy's explains some of the history:
> >
> >
> > http://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2
> > .html
> >
> > See the section entitled "First Implementation Past the Post".
>
> Interest
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:18:58 -0400
> Scott Lovenberg wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:49, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:36:43 -0600 Andreas Dilger
>> > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> At this point, my main questions are:
>
> This blog post of Jeremy's explains some of the history:
>
>
> http://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2
> .html
>
> See the section entitled "First Implementation Past the Post".
Interesting that Jeremy actually suggested the implementation should have
had an arbit
> > > At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> > > userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy
> > > and problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz
> > > started a thread on it here:
> > >
> > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gma
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 11:20:33 +0200
"Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> > At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> > userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
> > problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz s
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Frank Filz wrote:
> > I guess my main concern is that while I'm interested in adding interfaces
> that
> > make it _easier_ to implement fileservers, I'm not terribly interested in
> > adding interfaces that are _specific_ to implementing them.
> >
> > Wha
Hi Jeff,
> At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
> problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz started
> a thread on it here:
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:18:58 -0400
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:49, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:36:43 -0600 Andreas Dilger wrote:
> >>>
> >>> At this point, my main questions are:
> >>>
> >>> 1) does this look useful, particularly for fileserver i
On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:49, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:36:43 -0600 Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>>
>>> At this point, my main questions are:
>>>
>>> 1) does this look useful, particularly for fileserver implementors?
>
> Yes from the Samba perspective. We'll have to keep the old
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:36:43 -0600 Andreas Dilger wrote:
> >
> > At this point, my main questions are:
> >
> > 1) does this look useful, particularly for fileserver implementors?
Yes from the Samba perspective. We'll have to keep the old
code around for compatibility with non-Linux OS'es, but t
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:36:43 -0600
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:25:17AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> > userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
> > problematic behavior of POSIX
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:25:17AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
> problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz started
> a thread on it here:
>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:25:17AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
> problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz started
> a thread on it here:
>
> > > > > > At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist"
> > > > > > for userland file servers. One of the things brought up was
> > > > > > the goofy and problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is
> closed.
> > > > > > Boaz started a thread on it here:
> > > > > >
> > > >
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:07:30 -0700
"Frank Filz" wrote:
> > > > > At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> > > > > userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy
> > > > > and problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed.
> > > > > Boaz st
> > > > At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> > > > userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy
> > > > and problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed.
> > > > Boaz started a thread on it here:
> > > >
> > > > http://permalink.g
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:20:59 -0700
"Frank Filz" wrote:
> > > At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> > > userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
> > > problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz
> > > started a thread o
> > At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> > userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
> > problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz
> > started a thread on it here:
> >
> > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fil
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:25:17 -0400
Jeff Layton wrote:
> At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
> userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
> problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz started
> a thread on it here:
>
>
At LSF this year, there was a discussion about the "wishlist" for
userland file servers. One of the things brought up was the goofy and
problematic behavior of POSIX locks when a file is closed. Boaz started
a thread on it here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/73364
Userla
22 matches
Mail list logo
