Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] printk: Make it usable on nohz CPUs

2012-10-19 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
2012/10/12 Frederic Weisbecker : > Hi, > > So here is a proposition on what we can do to make printk > correctly working on a tickless CPU. > > Although it's targeted to be part of the adaptive tickmess > implemetation, it's pretty standalone and generic and also > works for printk() calls in

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] printk: Make it usable on nohz CPUs

2012-10-19 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
2012/10/12 Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com: Hi, So here is a proposition on what we can do to make printk correctly working on a tickless CPU. Although it's targeted to be part of the adaptive tickmess implemetation, it's pretty standalone and generic and also works for printk()

[RFC PATCH 0/5] printk: Make it usable on nohz CPUs

2012-10-12 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
Hi, So here is a proposition on what we can do to make printk correctly working on a tickless CPU. Although it's targeted to be part of the adaptive tickmess implemetation, it's pretty standalone and generic and also works for printk() calls in idle. It is based on latest linus tree. Waiting

[RFC PATCH 0/5] printk: Make it usable on nohz CPUs

2012-10-12 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
Hi, So here is a proposition on what we can do to make printk correctly working on a tickless CPU. Although it's targeted to be part of the adaptive tickmess implemetation, it's pretty standalone and generic and also works for printk() calls in idle. It is based on latest linus tree. Waiting