On Wed 18-12-13 14:20:15, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 05:20:50PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > Currently we have a per-process (cpuset in fact) flag but this will
> > change it to all or nothing. Is this really a good step?
> > Btw. I do not mind having PF_SPREAD_PAGE
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:48:13PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sure about the name?
> >
> > This is a boolean and "mode" implies it might be a bitmask. That said, I
> > recognise that my own naming also sucked because complaining about yours
> > I can see that mine also sucks.
>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:48:13PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
SNIP
Sure about the name?
This is a boolean and mode implies it might be a bitmask. That said, I
recognise that my own naming also sucked because complaining about yours
I can see that mine also sucks.
Is it
On Wed 18-12-13 14:20:15, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 05:20:50PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
Currently we have a per-process (cpuset in fact) flag but this will
change it to all or nothing. Is this really a good step?
Btw. I do not mind having PF_SPREAD_PAGE enabled
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:00:38PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:17:50AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Hi Mel,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:48:18PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > This
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 05:20:50PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 18-12-13 10:18:46, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 17-12-13 15:02:10, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > +pagecache_mempolicy_mode:
> > > > +
> > > >
On Wed 18-12-13 10:18:46, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 17-12-13 15:02:10, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +pagecache_mempolicy_mode:
> > > +
> > > +This is available only on NUMA kernels.
> > > +
> > > +Per default, the
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:00:38PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, this is what I've currently kicked off testes for
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma.git
> mm-pgalloc-interleave-zones-v4r12
>
Pushed a dirty tree by accident. Now
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 17-12-13 15:02:10, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...]
> > +pagecache_mempolicy_mode:
> > +
> > +This is available only on NUMA kernels.
> > +
> > +Per default, the configured memory policy is applicable to anonymous
> > +memory,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:17:50AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Hi Mel,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:48:18PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > This series is currently untested and is being posted to sync up
> > >
On Tue 17-12-13 15:02:10, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> +pagecache_mempolicy_mode:
> +
> +This is available only on NUMA kernels.
> +
> +Per default, the configured memory policy is applicable to anonymous
> +memory, shmem, tmpfs, etc., whereas pagecache is allocated in an
> +interleaving fashion
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 08:47:45AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 01:17 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> > Updated version with your tmpfs __GFP_PAGECACHE parts added and
> > documentation, changelog updated as necessary. I remain unconvinced
> > that tmpfs pages should be
On 12/18/2013 01:17 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Updated version with your tmpfs __GFP_PAGECACHE parts added and
> documentation, changelog updated as necessary. I remain unconvinced
> that tmpfs pages should be round-robined, but I agree with you that it
> is the conservative change to do for
On 12/18/2013 01:17 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Updated version with your tmpfs __GFP_PAGECACHE parts added and
documentation, changelog updated as necessary. I remain unconvinced
that tmpfs pages should be round-robined, but I agree with you that it
is the conservative change to do for 3.12
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 08:47:45AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 12/18/2013 01:17 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Updated version with your tmpfs __GFP_PAGECACHE parts added and
documentation, changelog updated as necessary. I remain unconvinced
that tmpfs pages should be round-robined, but I
On Tue 17-12-13 15:02:10, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
+pagecache_mempolicy_mode:
+
+This is available only on NUMA kernels.
+
+Per default, the configured memory policy is applicable to anonymous
+memory, shmem, tmpfs, etc., whereas pagecache is allocated in an
+interleaving fashion over
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:17:50AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:48:18PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
This series is currently untested and is being posted to sync up
discussions
on
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 17-12-13 15:02:10, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
+pagecache_mempolicy_mode:
+
+This is available only on NUMA kernels.
+
+Per default, the configured memory policy is applicable to anonymous
+memory, shmem, tmpfs,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:00:38PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
For what it's worth, this is what I've currently kicked off testes for
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma.git
mm-pgalloc-interleave-zones-v4r12
Pushed a dirty tree by accident. Now
On Wed 18-12-13 10:18:46, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 17-12-13 15:02:10, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
+pagecache_mempolicy_mode:
+
+This is available only on NUMA kernels.
+
+Per default, the configured memory
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 05:20:50PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 18-12-13 10:18:46, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 17-12-13 15:02:10, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
+pagecache_mempolicy_mode:
+
+This is available
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:00:38PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:17:50AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:48:18PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
This series is
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:48:18PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > This series is currently untested and is being posted to sync up discussions
> > on the treatment of page cache pages, particularly the sysv part. I have
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:48:18PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This series is currently untested and is being posted to sync up discussions
> on the treatment of page cache pages, particularly the sysv part. I have
> not thought it through in detail but postings patches is the easiest way
This series is currently untested and is being posted to sync up discussions
on the treatment of page cache pages, particularly the sysv part. I have
not thought it through in detail but postings patches is the easiest way
to highlight where I think a problem might be.
Changelog since v2
o Drop
This series is currently untested and is being posted to sync up discussions
on the treatment of page cache pages, particularly the sysv part. I have
not thought it through in detail but postings patches is the easiest way
to highlight where I think a problem might be.
Changelog since v2
o Drop
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:48:18PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
This series is currently untested and is being posted to sync up discussions
on the treatment of page cache pages, particularly the sysv part. I have
not thought it through in detail but postings patches is the easiest way
to
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:48:18PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
This series is currently untested and is being posted to sync up discussions
on the treatment of page cache pages, particularly the sysv part. I have
not
28 matches
Mail list logo
