On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk
>>> > about this?
>>>
>>> Still waiting for my
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk
>> > about this?
>>
>> Still waiting for my invite...
>>
>> But I will
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk
>> > about this?
>>
>> Still waiting for my invite...
>>
>> But I will be at Plumbers if folks want to discuss
[ this time w/o the html ]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk
> > about this?
>
> Still waiting for my invite...
>
> But I will be at Plumbers if folks want to discuss this.
Hey Rob,
I'm
[ this time w/o the html ]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Maybe you can try to find some minutes at the Kernel Summit to talk
> > about this?
>
> Still waiting for my invite...
>
> But I will be at Plumbers if folks want to discuss this.
Hey Rob,
I'm here so let's make
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:02:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> [...]
> > I had a more detailed look at the series during the last two weeks.
> > For me the approach
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:02:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> [...]
> > I had a more detailed look at the series during the last two weeks.
> > For me the approach
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
>> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
>> and
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
>> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
>> and decided extending
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
> and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
> adding DT
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 06:24:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
> and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
> adding DT
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote:
>> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
>> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
>> and decided extending it does make
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote:
>> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
>> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
>> and decided extending it does make sense. Using
On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote:
> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
> and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
> adding DT based device matching
On Wed 2016-08-24 18:24:30, Rob Herring wrote:
> This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
> existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
> and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
> adding DT based device matching
This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
adding DT based device matching and supporting buffer based write and
receive.
This is a new approach to supporting UART slave devices using the
existing serio bus. After Arnd's proding, I took another look at serio
and decided extending it does make sense. Using serio primarily requires
adding DT based device matching and supporting buffer based write and
receive.
18 matches
Mail list logo