Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v2r6

2013-12-23 Thread Mel Gorman
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 05:03:43PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > On 17.12.2013 22:23, Mel Gorman wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:07:35PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > >>On 13.12.2013 15:10, Mel Gorman wrote: > >>>Kicked this another bit today. It's still a bit half-baked but it restores > >>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v2r6

2013-12-21 Thread Zlatko Calusic
On 17.12.2013 22:23, Mel Gorman wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:07:35PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote: On 13.12.2013 15:10, Mel Gorman wrote: Kicked this another bit today. It's still a bit half-baked but it restores the historical performance and leaves the door open at the end for playing nic

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v2r6

2013-12-17 Thread Mel Gorman
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:07:35PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > On 13.12.2013 15:10, Mel Gorman wrote: > >Kicked this another bit today. It's still a bit half-baked but it restores > >the historical performance and leaves the door open at the end for playing > >nice with distributing file pages b

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v2r6

2013-12-17 Thread Zlatko Calusic
On 13.12.2013 15:10, Mel Gorman wrote: Kicked this another bit today. It's still a bit half-baked but it restores the historical performance and leaves the door open at the end for playing nice with distributing file pages between nodes. Finishing this series depends on whether we are going to ma

[RFC PATCH 0/7] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v2r6

2013-12-13 Thread Mel Gorman
Kicked this another bit today. It's still a bit half-baked but it restores the historical performance and leaves the door open at the end for playing nice with distributing file pages between nodes. Finishing this series depends on whether we are going to make the remote node behaviour of the fair