On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 09:59:34 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> On 8/7/20 8:06 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > So i personally don't think netdev statistics is a good idea, i doubt
> > it scales.
>
> +1
+1
Please stop using networking as the example for this.
We don't want file interfaces for stats, and
On Fri 2020-08-07 14:29:09, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> [resending to widen the CC lists per rdun...@infradead.org's suggestion
> original posting to lkml here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/5/1009]
>
> To try to restart the discussion of kernel statistics started by the
> statsfs patchsets
On 8/7/20 8:06 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> So i personally don't think netdev statistics is a good idea, i doubt
> it scales.
+1
> net/dev/stats/tx_bytes/annotations
> DESCRIPTION net\ device\ transmited\ bytes\ count
> CUMULATIVE
> net/dev/stats/tx_bytes/fields
> interface value
> str int
> net/dev/stats/tx_bytes/values
> lo 4394430608
> eth0 33353183843
> eth1 16228847091
This is a rather small system. Have
[resending to widen the CC lists per rdun...@infradead.org's suggestion
original posting to lkml here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/5/1009]
To try to restart the discussion of kernel statistics started by the
statsfs patchsets (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/332), I wanted
to share the following
On 8/5/20 5:14 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> To try to restart the discussion of kernel statistics started by the
> statsfs patchsets (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/332), I wanted
> to share the following set of patches which are Google's 'metricfs'
> implementation and some example uses. Google
To try to restart the discussion of kernel statistics started by the
statsfs patchsets (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/332), I wanted
to share the following set of patches which are Google's 'metricfs'
implementation and some example uses. Google has been using metricfs
internally since 2012 as
7 matches
Mail list logo
