Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-11 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 08/11/2016 08:36 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-11 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 08/11/2016 08:36 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > Okay, I just merged these

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-11 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 08/11/2016 08:36 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-11 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 08/11/2016 08:36 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > Okay, I just merged these

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-11 Thread Paul Moore
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: Okay, I just merged

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-11 Thread Paul Moore
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: Okay, I just merged these patches into selinux#next. With the exception

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-10 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Please find attached the V3 of patches. Changes since

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-10 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Please find attached the V3 of patches. Changes since V2 are as follows. >>> >>> - Fixed the build issue with

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-10 Thread Paul Moore
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> Okay, I just merged these patches into selinux#next. With the >> exception of some changes to restore the mode argument to >>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-10 Thread Paul Moore
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> Okay, I just merged these patches into selinux#next. With the >> exception of some changes to restore the mode argument to >> ovl_create_or_link() and to fix some whitespace damage the

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-10 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> Okay, I just merged these patches into selinux#next. With the >>> exception of some changes to

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-10 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> Okay, I just merged these patches into selinux#next. With the >>> exception of some changes to restore the mode argument to >>>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-08 Thread Paul Moore
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Please find attached the V3 of patches. Changes since V2 are as follows. >> >> - Fixed the build issue with CONFIG_SECURITY=n. >> >>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-08 Thread Paul Moore
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Please find attached the V3 of patches. Changes since V2 are as follows. >> >> - Fixed the build issue with CONFIG_SECURITY=n. >> >> - Dan Walsh was writing more tests for

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-08 Thread Paul Moore
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:09 PM, James Morris wrote: >>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: James, assuming the

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-08 Thread Paul Moore
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:09 PM, James Morris wrote: >>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: James, assuming the overlayfs-next branch is pulled during the merge window,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-08 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:09 PM, James Morris wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: >>> James, assuming the overlayfs-next branch is pulled during the merge >>> window, can you rebase your

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-08-08 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:09 PM, James Morris wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: >>> James, assuming the overlayfs-next branch is pulled during the merge >>> window, can you rebase your linux-security#next branch to v4.8-rc1 >>>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-22 Thread Paul Moore
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:09 PM, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: >> James, assuming the overlayfs-next branch is pulled during the merge >> window, can you rebase your linux-security#next branch to v4.8-rc1 >> once Linus tags it? > > Yep. On Fri,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-22 Thread Paul Moore
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:09 PM, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: >> James, assuming the overlayfs-next branch is pulled during the merge >> window, can you rebase your linux-security#next branch to v4.8-rc1 >> once Linus tags it? > > Yep. On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:05

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-22 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > These patches look fine to me, thanks for all your hard work and to > everyone who helped review and provide feedback. I have tagged these > patches for merging into the SELinux next branch after this merge

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-22 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > These patches look fine to me, thanks for all your hard work and to > everyone who helped review and provide feedback. I have tagged these > patches for merging into the SELinux next branch after this merge > window. > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-21 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: > James, assuming the overlayfs-next branch is pulled during the merge > window, can you rebase your linux-security#next branch to v4.8-rc1 > once Linus tags it? Yep. -- James Morris

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-21 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Paul Moore wrote: > James, assuming the overlayfs-next branch is pulled during the merge > window, can you rebase your linux-security#next branch to v4.8-rc1 > once Linus tags it? Yep. -- James Morris

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-21 Thread Paul Moore
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Hi All, > > Please find attached the V3 of patches. Changes since V2 are as follows. > > - Fixed the build issue with CONFIG_SECURITY=n. > > - Dan Walsh was writing more tests for selinux-testsuite and noted couple > of

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-21 Thread Paul Moore
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Hi All, > > Please find attached the V3 of patches. Changes since V2 are as follows. > > - Fixed the build issue with CONFIG_SECURITY=n. > > - Dan Walsh was writing more tests for selinux-testsuite and noted couple > of issues. I have fixed

[RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-13 Thread Vivek Goyal
Hi All, Please find attached the V3 of patches. Changes since V2 are as follows. - Fixed the build issue with CONFIG_SECURITY=n. - Dan Walsh was writing more tests for selinux-testsuite and noted couple of issues. I have fixed those issues and added two more patches in series. 1. We are

[RFC PATCH 0/9][V3] Overlayfs SELinux Support

2016-07-13 Thread Vivek Goyal
Hi All, Please find attached the V3 of patches. Changes since V2 are as follows. - Fixed the build issue with CONFIG_SECURITY=n. - Dan Walsh was writing more tests for selinux-testsuite and noted couple of issues. I have fixed those issues and added two more patches in series. 1. We are