Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Laurent, On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday, 23 October 2017 11:45:01 EEST Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Laurent, On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday, 23 October 2017 11:45:01 EEST Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: [snip] >> > Both

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Sakari, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> [snip] > > Still it shouldn't be forgotten that if the framework is geared towards > helping drivers

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Sakari, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> [snip] > > Still it shouldn't be forgotten that if the framework is geared towards > helping drivers "running one job at a

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Hans, On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 19:19:27 EEST Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 10/25/2017 05:48 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Monday, 23 October 2017 11:45:01 EEST Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > >>>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Hans, On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 19:19:27 EEST Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 10/25/2017 05:48 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Monday, 23 October 2017 11:45:01 EEST Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

On 10/25/2017 05:48 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday, 23 October 2017 11:45:01 EEST Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Hi everyone,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

On 10/25/2017 05:48 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > On Monday, 23 October 2017 11:45:01 EEST Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: Hi everyone, Here is a new

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hello, On Monday, 23 October 2017 11:45:01 EEST Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Here is a new attempt at the "request" (which

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hello, On Monday, 23 October 2017 11:45:01 EEST Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Here is a new attempt at the "request" (which I propose to rename

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

2017-10-16 Hans Verkuil : > Hi Alexandre, > > Thank you very much for working on this. Much appreciated! > > I only did a very high-level review of the patch series: there is not much > point IMHO of doing a detailed review given the upcoming discussions in > Prague. It's

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

2017-10-16 Hans Verkuil : > Hi Alexandre, > > Thank you very much for working on this. Much appreciated! > > I only did a very high-level review of the patch series: there is not much > point IMHO of doing a detailed review given the upcoming discussions in > Prague. It's better to wait until

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Sakari, thanks for the feedback! On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Here is a new attempt at the "request" (which I propose to rename "jobs")

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Sakari, thanks for the feedback! On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Here is a new attempt at the "request" (which I propose to rename "jobs") API >> for V4L2,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Hans, On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > Thank you very much for working on this. Much appreciated! Thanks! I feel like there is still a long way before we get this right though, so your guidance is highly appreciated! :) > I only

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Hans, On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > Thank you very much for working on this. Much appreciated! Thanks! I feel like there is still a long way before we get this right though, so your guidance is highly appreciated! :) > I only did a very high-level

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Alexandre, On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Here is a new attempt at the "request" (which I propose to rename "jobs") API > for V4L2, hopefully in a manner that can converge to something that will be > merged. The core ideas should be easy

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Alexandre, On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:50:18PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Here is a new attempt at the "request" (which I propose to rename "jobs") API > for V4L2, hopefully in a manner that can converge to something that will be > merged. The core ideas should be easy

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Alexandre, Thank you very much for working on this. Much appreciated! I only did a very high-level review of the patch series: there is not much point IMHO of doing a detailed review given the upcoming discussions in Prague. It's better to wait until we agree with the high-level API.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi Alexandre, Thank you very much for working on this. Much appreciated! I only did a very high-level review of the patch series: there is not much point IMHO of doing a detailed review given the upcoming discussions in Prague. It's better to wait until we agree with the high-level API.

[RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi everyone, Here is a new attempt at the "request" (which I propose to rename "jobs") API for V4L2, hopefully in a manner that can converge to something that will be merged. The core ideas should be easy to grasp for those familiar with the previous attemps, yet there are a few important

[RFC PATCH 0/9] V4L2 Jobs API WIP

Hi everyone, Here is a new attempt at the "request" (which I propose to rename "jobs") API for V4L2, hopefully in a manner that can converge to something that will be merged. The core ideas should be easy to grasp for those familiar with the previous attemps, yet there are a few important