* Peter Zijlstra [2013-07-31 17:09:23]:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 03:16:50PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > I am not against fault and fault based handling is very much needed.
> > I have listed that this approach is complementary to numa faults that
> > Mel is proposing.
> >
> > Right no
* Peter Zijlstra [2013-07-30 11:33:21]:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:45:43PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> > Can you please suggest workloads that I could try which might showcase
> > why you hate pure process based approach?
>
> 2 processes, 1 sysvshm segment. I know there's multi-proces
* Andrew Theurer [2013-07-31 08:33:44]:
> ------------
> VM-node00| 49153(006%) 673792(083%)51712(006%) 36352(004%)
>
> I think the consolidation is a nice concept, but it needs a much tighter
> integration with numa balancing
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 03:16:50PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> I am not against fault and fault based handling is very much needed.
> I have listed that this approach is complementary to numa faults that
> Mel is proposing.
>
> Right now I think if we can first get the tasks to consolidate
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 13:18 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Here is an approach that looks to consolidate workloads across nodes.
> This results in much improved performance. Again I would assume this work
> is complementary to Mel's work with numa faulting.
>
> Here are the advantages of this a
* Peter Zijlstra [2013-07-30 11:10:21]:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:33:45PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra [2013-07-30 10:20:01]:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:45:43PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Can you please suggest workloads that I could try which might showcase
> why you hate pure process based approach?
2 processes, 1 sysvshm segment. I know there's multi-process MPI
libraries out there.
Something like: perf bench
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:10:21AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:33:45PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra [2013-07-30 10:20:01]:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +05
* Peter Zijlstra [2013-07-30 10:20:01]:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > Here is an approach that looks to consolidate workloads across nodes.
> > > This results in much improved performa
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:33:45PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra [2013-07-30 10:20:01]:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > > Here is an approach that looks to con
* Peter Zijlstra [2013-07-30 10:20:01]:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > Here is an approach that looks to consolidate workloads across nodes.
> > > This results in much improved performa
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > Here is an approach that looks to consolidate workloads across nodes.
> > This results in much improved performance. Again I would assume this work
> > is complem
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Here is an approach that looks to consolidate workloads across nodes.
> This results in much improved performance. Again I would assume this work
> is complementary to Mel's work with numa faulting.
I highly dislike the use of ta
Here is an approach that looks to consolidate workloads across nodes.
This results in much improved performance. Again I would assume this work
is complementary to Mel's work with numa faulting.
Here are the advantages of this approach.
1. Provides excellent consolidation of tasks.
From my experi
14 matches
Mail list logo
