On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:52:46AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
[..]
> > > > Hi, Vivek
> > > >
> > > > For efi ioremapping case, in 3.15 kernel efi runtime maps will not be
> > > > saved
> > > > if efi=old_map is used. So you need detect this and fail the kexec file
> > > > load.
> > >
> > > Dave,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:52:46AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
[..]
Hi, Vivek
For efi ioremapping case, in 3.15 kernel efi runtime maps will not be
saved
if efi=old_map is used. So you need detect this and fail the kexec file
load.
Dave,
Instead of failing
On 06/18/14 at 09:45am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 06/17/14 at 10:24am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
> > >
On 06/17/14 at 10:24am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
> > >
> > > V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
> > >
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
> >
> > V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
> > V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
> >
> > Changes
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:13:28PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > This patch series does not do kernel signature verification yet. I
> > plan to post another patch series for that. Now bzImage is already
> > signed with PKCS7
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:13:28PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
This patch series does not do kernel signature verification yet. I
plan to post another patch series for that. Now bzImage is already
signed with PKCS7 signature I
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
Changes since v2:
-
On 06/17/14 at 10:24am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2:
On 06/18/14 at 09:45am, Dave Young wrote:
On 06/17/14 at 10:24am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> This patch series does not do kernel signature verification yet. I
> plan to post another patch series for that. Now bzImage is already
> signed with PKCS7 signature I plan to parse and verify those
> signatures.
Btw, do you have a
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
This patch series does not do kernel signature verification yet. I
plan to post another patch series for that. Now bzImage is already
signed with PKCS7 signature I plan to parse and verify those
signatures.
Btw, do you have a brief
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
> >
> > V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
> > V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
> >
> > Changes
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
Changes since v2:
-
On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
>
> V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
> V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
>
> Changes since v2:
>
> - Took care of most of the review comments from V2.
> - Added
On 06/03/14 at 09:06am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
Changes since v2:
- Took care of most of the review comments from V2.
- Added support for
On 06/06/14 at 04:04pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 03:37:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
> > > [..]
> > > > > + ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd,
On 06/06/14 at 04:04pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 03:37:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
[..]
+ ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd,
On 6 June 2014 22:00, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Yes, presumably (as a separate patch since the actual commit is quite
> large.) The patch needs to have a good description why the original
> patch was wrong.
Right. I'll take a look at this in the morning.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On 06/06/2014 01:58 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On 6 June 2014 21:37, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> OK... this is seriously problematic.
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && \
>> !defined(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED)
>>/* kernel/boot_param/ramdisk could be loaded above
On 6 June 2014 21:37, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> OK... this is seriously problematic.
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && \
> !defined(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED)
>/* kernel/boot_param/ramdisk could be loaded above 4g */
> # define XLF1 XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G
>
On 06/06/2014 12:37 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>>
>> [..]
+ ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd, info.command_line,
+ info.command_line_len,
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 03:37:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> > > > + ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd,
> > > > info.command_line,
> > > > +
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 07:45:17AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On 06/05/2014 04:04 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:39:10PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> >> Vivek,
> >>
> >> As per Documentation/SubmitChecklist , please CC linux-api@ on patces
> >> that
On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> [..]
> > > + ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd, info.command_line,
> > > + info.command_line_len, info.kexec_flags);
> >
> > Vivek,
> >
> > I tried your
On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
[..]
+ ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd, info.command_line,
+ info.command_line_len, info.kexec_flags);
Vivek,
I tried your patch on my uefi
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 07:45:17AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
On 06/05/2014 04:04 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:39:10PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Vivek,
As per Documentation/SubmitChecklist , please CC linux-api@ on patces
that change the ABI/API.
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 03:37:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
[..]
+ ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd,
info.command_line,
+
On 06/06/2014 12:37 AM, Dave Young wrote:
On 06/05/14 at 11:01am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
[..]
+ ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd, info.command_line,
+ info.command_line_len, info.kexec_flags);
Vivek,
On 6 June 2014 21:37, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
OK... this is seriously problematic.
#if defined(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) defined(CONFIG_X86_64) \
!defined(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED)
/* kernel/boot_param/ramdisk could be loaded above 4g */
# define XLF1 XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G
On 06/06/2014 01:58 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
On 6 June 2014 21:37, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
OK... this is seriously problematic.
#if defined(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) defined(CONFIG_X86_64) \
!defined(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED)
/* kernel/boot_param/ramdisk could be loaded above 4g
On 6 June 2014 22:00, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
Yes, presumably (as a separate patch since the actual commit is quite
large.) The patch needs to have a good description why the original
patch was wrong.
Right. I'll take a look at this in the morning.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On 06/05/2014 04:04 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:39:10PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>> Vivek,
>>
>> As per Documentation/SubmitChecklist , please CC linux-api@ on patces
>> that change the ABI/API. See
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-api-ml.html.
>
> Hi
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
[..]
> > + ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd, info.command_line,
> > + info.command_line_len, info.kexec_flags);
>
> Vivek,
>
> I tried your patch on my uefi test machine, but kexec load fails like
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:39:10PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Vivek,
>
> As per Documentation/SubmitChecklist , please CC linux-api@ on patces
> that change the ABI/API. See
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-api-ml.html.
Hi Michael,
Sorry, I did not notice that. I will CC
On 06/03/14 at 09:12am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
> >
> > V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
> > V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
> >
> > Changes
On 06/03/14 at 09:12am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
Changes since v2:
-
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:39:10PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Vivek,
As per Documentation/SubmitChecklist , please CC linux-api@ on patces
that change the ABI/API. See
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-api-ml.html.
Hi Michael,
Sorry, I did not notice that. I will CC linux-api@
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
[..]
+ ret = kexec_file_load(kernel_fd, info.initrd_fd, info.command_line,
+ info.command_line_len, info.kexec_flags);
Vivek,
I tried your patch on my uefi test machine, but kexec load fails like below:
On 06/05/2014 04:04 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:39:10PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Vivek,
As per Documentation/SubmitChecklist , please CC linux-api@ on patces
that change the ABI/API. See
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-api-ml.html.
Hi Michael,
Vivek,
As per Documentation/SubmitChecklist , please CC linux-api@ on patces
that change the ABI/API. See
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-api-ml.html.
Also, is there some draft man page for this new system call?
Thanks,
Michael
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 05:22:14PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
[..]
> > Index: kexec-tools/kexec/kexec.h
> > ===
> > --- kexec-tools.orig/kexec/kexec.h 2014-06-02 14:34:16.719774316 -0400
> > +++ kexec-tools/kexec/kexec.h
On 06/03/14 at 09:12am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
> >
> > V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
> > V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
> >
> > Changes
On 06/03/14 at 09:12am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
Changes since v2:
-
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 05:22:14PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
[..]
Index: kexec-tools/kexec/kexec.h
===
--- kexec-tools.orig/kexec/kexec.h 2014-06-02 14:34:16.719774316 -0400
+++ kexec-tools/kexec/kexec.h 2014-06-02
Vivek,
As per Documentation/SubmitChecklist , please CC linux-api@ on patces
that change the ABI/API. See
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-api-ml.html.
Also, is there some draft man page for this new system call?
Thanks,
Michael
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Vivek Goyal
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
>
> V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
> V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
>
> Changes since v2:
>
> - Took care of most of the review comments
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
Changes since v2:
- Took care of most of the review comments from V2.
- Added support for kexec/kdump on EFI systems.
- Dropped support for
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
Changes since v2:
- Took care of most of the review comments from V2.
- Added support for kexec/kdump on EFI systems.
- Dropped support for
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:06:49AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi,
This is V3 of the patchset. Previous versions were posted here.
V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/540
V2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/331
Changes since v2:
- Took care of most of the review comments from V2.
-
50 matches
Mail list logo
