Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-09 Thread Mel Gorman
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:42:57PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Hi Mel, > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:14:36AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > > This series addresses part of the integration and sharing problem by > > implementing a foundation that either the policy for schednuma or autonuma > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-09 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
Hi Mel, On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:14:36AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > This series addresses part of the integration and sharing problem by > implementing a foundation that either the policy for schednuma or autonuma > can be rebased on. The actual policy it implements is a very stupid > greedy

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-09 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
Hi Mel, On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:14:36AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: This series addresses part of the integration and sharing problem by implementing a foundation that either the policy for schednuma or autonuma can be rebased on. The actual policy it implements is a very stupid greedy policy

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-09 Thread Mel Gorman
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:42:57PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: Hi Mel, On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:14:36AM +, Mel Gorman wrote: This series addresses part of the integration and sharing problem by implementing a foundation that either the policy for schednuma or autonuma can be

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-07 Thread Zhouping Liu
On 11/08/2012 02:39 PM, 杨竹 wrote: > Hi all: > I got a problem: > 1. on intel cpu xeon E5000 family which support xapic ,one NIC > irq can share on the CPUs basic on smp_affinity. > 2. but on intel cpu xeon E5-2600 family which support x2apic, one > NIC irq only on

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-07 Thread Zhouping Liu
On 11/07/2012 11:25 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:27:12PM +0800, Zhouping Liu wrote: Hello Mel, my 2 nodes machine hit a panic fault after applied the patch set(based on kernel-3.7.0-rc4), please review it: Early initialisation problem by the looks of things. Try this

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-07 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:27:12PM +0800, Zhouping Liu wrote: > > Hello Mel, > > my 2 nodes machine hit a panic fault after applied the patch > set(based on kernel-3.7.0-rc4), please review it: > > Early initialisation problem by the looks of things. Try this please ---8<--- mm: numa: Check

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-07 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:27:12PM +0800, Zhouping Liu wrote: Hello Mel, my 2 nodes machine hit a panic fault after applied the patch set(based on kernel-3.7.0-rc4), please review it: SNIP Early initialisation problem by the looks of things. Try this please ---8--- mm: numa: Check that

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-07 Thread Zhouping Liu
On 11/07/2012 11:25 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:27:12PM +0800, Zhouping Liu wrote: Hello Mel, my 2 nodes machine hit a panic fault after applied the patch set(based on kernel-3.7.0-rc4), please review it: SNIP Early initialisation problem by the looks of things. Try this

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-07 Thread Zhouping Liu
On 11/08/2012 02:39 PM, 杨竹 wrote: Hi all: I got a problem: 1. on intel cpu xeon E5000 family which support xapic ,one NIC irq can share on the CPUs basic on smp_affinity. 2. but on intel cpu xeon E5-2600 family which support x2apic, one NIC irq only on CPU0

[RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-06 Thread Mel Gorman
There are currently two competing approaches to implement support for automatically migrating pages to optimise NUMA locality. Performance results are available for both but review highlighted different problems in both. They are not compatible with each other even though some fundamental

[RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

2012-11-06 Thread Mel Gorman
There are currently two competing approaches to implement support for automatically migrating pages to optimise NUMA locality. Performance results are available for both but review highlighted different problems in both. They are not compatible with each other even though some fundamental