On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:10:45 David Howells wrote:
> cmpxchg_local() is not signed-value safe because on a 64-bit machine signed
> int arguments to it may be sign-extended to signed long _before_ begin cast
> to unsigned long. This potentially causes comparisons to fail when dealing
> with
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:10:45 David Howells wrote:
> cmpxchg_local() is not signed-value safe because on a 64-bit machine signed
> int arguments to it may be sign-extended to signed long _before_ begin cast
> to unsigned long. This potentially causes comparisons to fail when dealing
> with
cmpxchg_local() is not signed-value safe because on a 64-bit machine signed
int arguments to it may be sign-extended to signed long _before_ begin cast
to unsigned long. This potentially causes comparisons to fail when dealing
with negative values.
Fix the generic atomic functions that are
cmpxchg_local() is not signed-value safe because on a 64-bit machine signed
int arguments to it may be sign-extended to signed long _before_ begin cast
to unsigned long. This potentially causes comparisons to fail when dealing
with negative values.
Fix the generic atomic functions that are
4 matches
Mail list logo
