Re: [RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-11-17 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Christopher Heiny wrote: > rmi_i2c.c abstracts an RMI4 device on some arbitrary I2C bus as a logical > device in the RMI bus. It handles reads/writes from/to the RMI4 devices, > and manages the page select register setting (since the meaning of page > select is

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-11-17 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Christopher Heiny che...@synaptics.com wrote: rmi_i2c.c abstracts an RMI4 device on some arbitrary I2C bus as a logical device in the RMI bus. It handles reads/writes from/to the RMI4 devices, and manages the page select register setting (since the meaning of

[RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-11-16 Thread Christopher Heiny
rmi_i2c.c abstracts an RMI4 device on some arbitrary I2C bus as a logical device in the RMI bus. It handles reads/writes from/to the RMI4 devices, and manages the page select register setting (since the meaning of page select is dependent on the physical layer used to communicate with the RMi4

[RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-11-16 Thread Christopher Heiny
rmi_i2c.c abstracts an RMI4 device on some arbitrary I2C bus as a logical device in the RMI bus. It handles reads/writes from/to the RMI4 devices, and manages the page select register setting (since the meaning of page select is dependent on the physical layer used to communicate with the RMi4

RE: [RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-10-10 Thread Christopher Heiny
Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Christopher Heiny > wrote: > > The I2C physical driver is not extensively changed in terms of > > functionality since the previous patch. Management of the attention GPIO > > has been moved to rmi_driver.c (see previous email), and most of

RE: [RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-10-10 Thread Christopher Heiny
Linus Walleij wrote: On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Christopher Heiny che...@synaptics.com wrote: The I2C physical driver is not extensively changed in terms of functionality since the previous patch. Management of the attention GPIO has been moved to rmi_driver.c (see previous email),

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-10-09 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Christopher Heiny wrote: > The I2C physical driver is not extensively changed in terms of functionality > since the previous patch. Management of the attention GPIO has been moved to > rmi_driver.c (see previous email), and most of the debug related interfaces >

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-10-09 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Christopher Heiny che...@synaptics.com wrote: The I2C physical driver is not extensively changed in terms of functionality since the previous patch. Management of the attention GPIO has been moved to rmi_driver.c (see previous email), and most of the debug

[RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-10-05 Thread Christopher Heiny
The I2C physical driver is not extensively changed in terms of functionality since the previous patch. Management of the attention GPIO has been moved to rmi_driver.c (see previous email), and most of the debug related interfaces have been moved from sysfs to debugfs. Control of the debug

[RFC PATCH 03/06] input/rmi4: I2C physical interface

2012-10-05 Thread Christopher Heiny
The I2C physical driver is not extensively changed in terms of functionality since the previous patch. Management of the attention GPIO has been moved to rmi_driver.c (see previous email), and most of the debug related interfaces have been moved from sysfs to debugfs. Control of the debug