On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 01:18:15PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> I think so too. Patches #07-10 can be split into a separate patchset.
> I guess they are included just because Kent tried to follow up
> suggestions in the previous discussion.
> I don't care about either way. So I'll split them up.
In
On 23.12.2014 02:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Does this and the next three patches really depend on the earlier ones?
> Unless I'm missing something they are cleanups on their own.
>
> It might make sense to get all these cleanups out as a preparatory
> series first.
I think so too. Patches #07
Does this and the next three patches really depend on the earlier ones?
Unless I'm missing something they are cleanups on their own.
It might make sense to get all these cleanups out as a preparatory
series first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
From: Kent Overstreet
Make use of a new interface provided by iov_iter, backed by
scatter-gather list of iovec, instead of the old interface based on
sg_iovec. Also use iov_iter_advance() instead of manual iteration.
This commit should contain only literal replacements, without
functional change
4 matches
Mail list logo
