Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/10] scsi/trace: Use scsi_print_sense trace point instead of printk

2014-08-27 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
(2014/08/27 23:15), Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 08/08/2014 01:50 PM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Previous sense messages can be mixed into other sense messages, because continuous printk (KERN_CONT) was used. To avoid the problem, patch d87f3a6f51 introduced a local buffer in Hannes's baranch (*1). B

Re: [RFC PATCH 08/10] scsi/trace: Use scsi_print_sense trace point instead of printk

2014-08-27 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 08/08/2014 01:50 PM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: Previous sense messages can be mixed into other sense messages, because continuous printk (KERN_CONT) was used. To avoid the problem, patch d87f3a6f51 introduced a local buffer in Hannes's baranch (*1). But using local buffers can induce stack over

[RFC PATCH 08/10] scsi/trace: Use scsi_print_sense trace point instead of printk

2014-08-08 Thread Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
Previous sense messages can be mixed into other sense messages, because continuous printk (KERN_CONT) was used. To avoid the problem, patch d87f3a6f51 introduced a local buffer in Hannes's baranch (*1). But using local buffers can induce stack overflow, so we want to solve the problem without local